Liberals, if we lose the war in iraq, will you blame Bush?

Question

How could I blame clinton?


Silly liberals cutting and running from the question.

Answer 1

Liberals are the "CUT AND RUN" party that is their motto

Answer 2

We already won the freaking war! We took Saddam out of power and gained control. Now, it's just time to get out. It's a total mess. We should have never gone in there. All that money we waisted on stupid contractors should have gone directly to the people or Iraq to rebuild. (Or save some of our own money, because deficit spending in this case is unwise) Yes, I blame Bush and his cronies for this occupation of Iraq and all the death it has caused and will continue to cause. BUT, against all logic the right will find a way to blame Clinton.
Yes, I and I pretty much have the rest of the civilized and educated, locigal thinking people, most the world backing me: Yes, it's obvious we will all blame Bush. (and his cronies)

Oh, how I miss FDR.

Answer 3

If we lose the war in Iraq I will PARTIALLY blame Bush, but not fully.

I think he made poor choices from the very beginning. Though, that's not to say all of the choices were handed to him on a silver platter. In addition, Iraq is a tough place. And NO ONE can predict what will happen there tomorrow. It's a very difficult situation. I think a great president could've done more and better things, but it's not wholey Bush's fault.

Answer 4

While I am far from a Liberal...the very reason we are there is President Bush. If we loose who else would you blame.

Perhaps the underfunded military who went into IRAQ under manned? Perhaps the military that have a hard time protecting itself let alone the people we supposedly liberated. Hea! let's blame Saddam. If he had only been a decent guy we wouldn't have to take him out right?

Who...in your conservative ways..would you blame for it's failure?

Answer 5

Who else can be blamed? He is the Commander-In-Chief. He should expect to assume all responsibility and take full accountability for the illegal and unconstitutional 'war' he initiated for no justifiable reason.
Besides, we've already 'lost the war', but the Bushites don't care about that. They never intended to bring democracy to Iraq; they never expected to restore order and peace to a region that's been in cultural clashes for 1,400 years. All they wanted was Iraq's OIL.
Of the five primary terrorists in the past 75 years, only one has ever faced justice:
Joseph Stalin killed 10 million of his countrymen and died in his sleep;
Adolph Hitler killed 6 million Jews and committed suicide;
Idi Amin killed 2 million people in Uganda and retired in luxurious exile;
George W. Bush has killed 665,000 Iraqis and 3,000 American soldiers (so far) without accepting any responsibility for such mass murder, and without facing any kind of international tribunal for high crimes against humanity;
Saddam Hussein was sentenced to death for killing 148 people in a small Iraqi village. He is the only one of these five tyrants to ever face a court of law. Bush should be tried for his murderous activities, and - if convicted - must hang right alongside Hussein. -RKO-

Answer 6

Speaking as an army vet and a liberal, I already do blame Bush. We should've finished up in Afghanisatan before we went anywhere else; notwithstanding what scum Soddamn Insane and his cohorts were, we had other targets that needed taking down long before Iraq. Bush ****** up, big and bad, and the rodent's going to go on ******* up as long as he infests the White House.

Answer 7

No, Bush will blame the liberals for their "non-support", and at least 1/3 of the country will believe that losing wars is a consequence of dissent.

Answer 8

We already lost he war and I don't think Al Gore is president at this time so my guess that Bush would be a good choice for the blame.Is that a good enough answer for a GOP RIGHT WINGER who hates the little people? And yes to the guy who said look what happened in Viet Nam I remember what happened your republican president cut an ran and left millions in equipment there and through the rest in the ocean. Great example jerk.

Answer 9

The United States Military could crush that entire country in a week if allowed to do so. The reason we are “losing” is not because we can’t fight, it’s because many don’t want them to. We spend more time kissing babies and handing out bowls of rice than we do to end the opposition. If we took the cameras out of their and let them do their job, it would have been over by now. We would have lost WWII if we had to put up with the political strife we do now.

Answer 10

We've already lost the war. The reason our troops are still in harms way is that Bush is having a tantrum.

Answer 11

Exactly what do you mean by ....Lose.....,we took out Saddam, what more do you guys want, peace or something.....get real....(these people have hated each other for many years,do you really believe a GI witha M-16 is gonna change that) dream on......