Separation of church and state!
2006-12-24 03:36:07 · 15 answers · asked by Kate the Saint 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Wow, you go commie girl!
2006-12-24 03:40:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Freedom of speech allows this. I think you need to go back and research the Constitution because the part that the ACLU and others like to shove down our throats, about " Separation of Church and State," deals with not allowing the State to have a State sponsored Religion. Most of the people who settled here came from England and of course, England has a state sponsored religion. Our forefathers didn't want this to happen here so, it was addressed in the Constitution.
The Liberals use it to keep the Cross, or the Manger from public lands. Any law can be twisted and turned to mean something different so, give the ACLU and the Liberals enough time and even Church's wont be able to broadcast over the airwaves.
Sounds like what went on for years in Russia and is goin on in North Korea and China. Smells like Communism to me!!!
2006-12-24 03:41:55 · answer #2 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You liberals need to read the Constitution before you show the world your intelligence. The separation of church and state was to protect the church from the state, giving people the right to worship for who they want.
2006-12-24 03:38:44 · answer #3 · answered by 007 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who says there public!! Radio stations pay hefty price to broadcast on an assigned freq in their area ie kfi 640 am in Los Angeles Ca. You broadcast a signal on that freq in Los Angeles. You would be in deep brown stuff.
2006-12-24 03:54:51 · answer #4 · answered by Flat_out_Bob 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely! 'Congress shall make no laws concerning the ESTABLISHMENT of a religion" I don't see how this is "establishing" a religion.
There is no such term in the constitution as "Separation of church and state>
2006-12-24 05:02:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In America we have the freedom of speech and this is our privilege and right to share even our religious services. Who knows, someone may be touched in a special way.
2006-12-24 03:40:08 · answer #6 · answered by ♨ Wisper ► 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only when the airwaves are leased to a private entity.
2006-12-24 03:43:40 · answer #7 · answered by The Twist 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it's legal. The separation refers to "government" not "public" (yes, there IS a difference).
2006-12-24 03:43:03 · answer #8 · answered by psyop6 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A little thing called, Freedom of Speech. Even though we really DON'T have freedom of speech anymore, that was the premise. You don't like what you hear, turn off the station!!!
2006-12-24 03:37:44 · answer #9 · answered by wanninonni 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think of you have neglected the mark. this is not despise of Rush as much as this is melancholy over the shown fact that his listeners think of this entertainer is offering valid, independent journalism. this is as absurd as thinking Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert are newshounds. at the same time as I get excitement from the particularly some issues they present, they are nonetheless basically offering entertainment, like Rush and FOX.
2016-11-23 15:08:39 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure it is.
Maybe you could move to some Islamic country and see if you like the radio stations better there.
2006-12-24 03:38:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋