Clinton lied UNDER OATH and the liberals were saying, 'he's married and getting head from other women so of course he's going to lie about it.' They didn't seem to mind that Clinton lied but now they say Bush lied and I've heard some liberals say they want him to resign. Why didn't they want Clinton to resign?
2006-12-24 02:55:26 · 27 answers · asked by Abu 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They will tell you Clinton LIED ABOUT A BJ ONLY!! Even though in fact, the man committed perjury, something anyone else would go to jail for.What's funnier yet is the "crimes" they accuse Bush of were all approved by their own precious Hillary Clinton , John Kerry and voted on 3 times by almost all of the Democrats..So I guess all of them too should resign??
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
EDIT-See?? I told ya so!!
2006-12-24 02:57:46 · answer #1 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Clinton is over and done with. Bush is here and now and we are in a war that we are not winning; Bush says in November that we're winning and in December we're not winning - believe me, calling him a liar is about the most polite thing we can say about that.
EDIT - Of course it mattered that Clinton lied under oath to avoid prosecution for harassment; it also matters that I go 70 in a 50 mph zone while a couple of other folks are committing armed robbery or shooting a bunch of people in a factory.
2006-12-24 03:15:07 · answer #2 · answered by ash 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He wasn't given fake data follower. Bush replaced into informed via Wilson Iraq wasn't paying for yellow cake. What did his followers do? They ratted out his spouse, Valerie Plame, as being a CIA worker. He replaced into informed there have been no WMD's, yet he glided by any skill. so a great way as bush being spoke of as a fascist, why is it that each thing popping out of the White domicile if worry, and that we are with the terrorist if we don't help his coverage of sitting in Iraq the place THERE are no longer any TERRORISTS. Why do no longer YOU provide it up....
2016-10-18 22:52:25 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton lied under oath and should have resigned because of it and faced charges of perjury - even if he did originally lie about something pretty trivial in the whole scheme of things. However, I don't believe he should have been impeached in the first place, cause put simply it's his buisiness who he has affairs with, infidelity is NOT a crime - destruction of american morals or not. However the fact remains he lied under oath - so he should have faced charges.
Bush lied to congress (which Clinton did not do) and also to the american people (which Clinton did do), but also lied to the British, Spanish, Romanian, Japanese - every member of the Coalition. Bush's lies have led to the deaths of thousands of soldiers, as well as countless innocent Iraqis. This is a much bigger lie. Bush should also resign, face impeachment, and war crimes charges.
2006-12-24 03:02:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mordent 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I love what Kinky Friedman said about politics..."Poly comes from the Latin and means more than one, and tics are blood sucking insects." Liberals love to call George W. Bush a liar because he lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
That is it. Pure and simple. That does not mean that Democrats never lie. They are, however, the lesser of two necessary evils.
Clinton's sex act with Monica Lueinsky did not effect his handling of foriegn or domestic policy. His lying about it did not get us into a war with a Middle Eastern country.
2006-12-24 05:39:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton didn't lie.The definition of sex in that case was touching the genitalia of a person to get aroused,pretty stupid but that's what it came down to.He never touched her there,that's his story.She gave him oral sex so the only part he touched was her mouth and lips.When asked if he had sex with her he could honestly say no under that moronic definition.If they had asked if she had sex with him he would have to have confessed.
It's fully within your legal rights not to volunteer information.For spending all that cash they were pretty simple in my opinion.
2006-12-24 03:19:21 · answer #6 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because it's his 15 minutes right now. The republicans do the accusing as well. It's human nature.
2006-12-24 03:03:50 · answer #7 · answered by angrycelt 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because getting head in the Oval office makes him their hero.
It doesn't matter that he lied under oath to avoid prosecution for sexual harassment.
2006-12-24 03:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
The liberals do not think that self gratification is a crime, so you can cheat and lie as long as it feels good. They hate Bush because he has the scrote that Clinton and Carter do not.
2006-12-24 03:00:08 · answer #9 · answered by 007 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Because they don't feel that infidelity is a crime. They are ignorant and blind to clinton and his crimes. And people wonder how Hitler was able to get as far as he did. He used the weak minds such as we have with the liberals and learned to control and direct their thoughts.
2006-12-24 03:01:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋