2006-12-24 02:49:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No! He should have his own monument larger than Mt. Rushmore.
2006-12-24 02:52:14 · answer #1 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I support Bush, however no ones face should have ever been craved into mount Rushmore. That area is holy land to the Lakota Indians. Mount Rushmore was just a slap in the Indians face whenever the United States government carved it.
2006-12-24 03:01:26 · answer #2 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, let's fill Rushmore with incompetent Presidents.
2006-12-24 02:53:08 · answer #3 · answered by The Twist 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i DON'T think so because i believe that he has done to much DAMAGE to our country and other countries!!!!!!! i honestly don't think we're ever going to forget about him and i don't think he should be added to Mount Rushmore!!!!
2006-12-24 02:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by cookiemonster31 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Is this a "stir everybody" question? Because that's a joke! Hahaha! He should be a crumbled statue, that was torn down.
2006-12-24 02:55:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's already there...you just can't see him,cause he's got his head up the other George's butt......(think about that every time you look,from now on....Hahahahahahah)
2006-12-24 02:53:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why piss America's money away on that? We have Iran to deal w/ now.
2006-12-24 02:52:15 · answer #7 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
LOL....Why would this even be an issue? -
2006-12-24 02:54:18 · answer #8 · answered by behr28 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what a horrible thought...
2006-12-24 03:07:35 · answer #9 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Just no.
2006-12-24 02:51:35 · answer #10 · answered by awesomecommunist 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋