mute point... hitler would have been forced to use a nuclear bomb in Stalingrad or Moscow, which would have turned the war nuclear on all sides (not just hiroshima). we would all be dust.
2006-12-24 02:47:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Indigo Cobra 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow, that's a puzzling question(no sarcasm the two), i will see wherein you're saying, because of the fact the form of conflict machines throughout the time of WWII was surprising, even with the undeniable fact that i could could desire to assert todays united states of america. we've diffused utilized sciences that could desire to blow any u . s . (from previous eras particularly) away. think of approximately it, we've in all probability the main complicated fighter ever, the F-22, alongside side the F-35, F-15, F-18, A-10 (my individual fave), and thats basically some. we've the Abrams tank, it relatively is able to stand up to shells from tanks in the present day which could be so lots extra reliable than the Shermans back then, alongside side the aptitude to shoot and pass, a great capabilities in tank conflict, and have a variety unmatched. infantrymen are armed with weapons that could desire to tear armor and infantrymen from then aside....even Anti-Air placements for them B-17s and P-51s. to no longer say our naval capabilities. All in all, present united states of america could desire to win.
2016-10-05 23:30:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by banowski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A few more attacks and the liberals will be forced to realize the peril we are all in. We are presently in a world war... and we must win, just to be able to survive. The seriousness of the situation should become evident as the Horn of Africa is ready to go up in flames.
2006-12-24 16:33:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leaving nuclear weapons out of it. You are probably correct but what would Hitler do with all of the muslims now in Europe
China would be the winner because they would come in after and enjoy the spoils
2006-12-24 02:52:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe, but more so under imperialism and iron fists. People as a world today are more educated, so to control them will be more difficult without IRON fists. You can see Gov't & religions are the real evils for MAN!
2006-12-24 02:56:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by honker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In war it is my opinion that the country which has the most wealth,natural resources and manpower and that can self sustain itself in difficult times and providing they are technolically advanced or equal to the opposing country will always triumph.
2006-12-24 04:18:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by catalyist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is hard to imagine. That is because during both world wars, Americans were on the side of the good guys, not today.
2006-12-24 03:08:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I cannot see why we would loose now or back then.
2006-12-24 02:52:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by AN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
bah humbug.
2006-12-24 13:55:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course we would
2006-12-24 02:49:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋