English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-24 00:20:08 · 18 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Didn't we get Cherie as a 'bonus' for voting in her husband?

2006-12-24 00:28:13 · update #1

18 answers

Cherie Blair should be flogged. Not only is she an embarrasment to her useless husband, she's an embarrasment to the British people and the bloody human race. She doesn't have even close to the class the Hillary Clinton does. Hillary is a politician, and a good one. Cherie is an oxygen thief.

2006-12-24 01:27:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cherie has gone on record as saying that she is a terrible politician, but a very good lawyer, and Tony is a very good politician but a very bad lawyer. I don't think we'll be seeing her in No. 10 any time soon.

As for Hillary Clinton as U.S. president, that would just be plain terrifying.

2006-12-27 13:28:02 · answer #2 · answered by Máirtín 2 · 0 0

They were both involved in sleazy property deals. Hillary at Whitewater and Cherie in Bristol. Do we really want more of this type of thing

2006-12-25 03:33:52 · answer #3 · answered by mick t 5 · 0 0

Cherie Blair maybe. Hillary never. You trying to get us all killed?
Hillary has convinced everyone that her liberal media army will protect us all with her as the leader. Ha.
We all need to say our prayers!
BTW - Merry Christmas!

2006-12-24 00:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I doubt very much that Mrs Blair would want to be PM, surely she has had enough of political life, that has `rubbed off `from her husband. The thought of another Clinton on the other side of the pond. would I am afraid drive me to drink.

2006-12-24 12:41:51 · answer #5 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0 0

When one Tony Blair has done enough damage to Britain by his playing second fiddle to Bush, do we really need another Blair from the family to continue the task? God forbid let that not happen at all.

2006-12-24 00:25:52 · answer #6 · answered by Brahmanyan 5 · 0 0

i like the idea of symmetry, but Cherie is not even a member of parliament and the UK system is diff from the US and it is therefore practically impossible for her to run her husband's party.

2006-12-24 00:50:48 · answer #7 · answered by Boring 5 · 1 0

No way.
Its highly unfair to compare the two.
An the fact that Cherie hosts meetings at number ten really pisses me off, who the fuc!< elected her, nobody, she's not an M.P.

2006-12-24 00:26:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

nicely i must admit, it kind of feels somewhat unusual that the spouse of the ex-correct Minister might want to furnish information that enables human beings to get around the regulation that his personal authorities carried out. yet, having reported that, possibly that's not so outstanding. once you concentrate on that this authorities has effectively legalised hashish, instructed mother and father that they couldn't self-discipline their little ones, instructed the police that they couldn't self-discipline childrens and that the courts ought to bypass punitive sentences on criminals (except motorists). What you achieve, you stitch. definite, I meant it that way round.

2016-12-01 03:31:00 · answer #9 · answered by cheathem 4 · 0 0

who is hillary? bt i knw Cherie- cool name- by her last name. bt hopefully they wud b beta than bush and blair...'the laeders of the world.' u knw sadams poeple shud just attack them and tourcher them...bt how can that happen wen bush and sadam are friends...he lives in bushs basement!

2006-12-24 02:14:08 · answer #10 · answered by Me!! 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers