After Rumsfeld vacated his position Cheney refers to him as being the greatest secretary of defense to have ever served in that position of all time. Dose he truly believe this or is it just another lie in a laughable, comically misguided attempt to dupe the general public in an effort to do damage control for the republican party?
2006-12-23 21:31:38 · 13 answers · asked by daizzddre 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First of all doggzilla nowhere in my post do I state my affiliation to any party so your intelligence just shins through when you go making assumptions as morons do from time to time. Secondly, you apparently don't have a very good command of the English language. Once again you assume that I said democrats are better than republicans when in fact nowhere in my post dose this figment of your imagination
appear. Thirdly, the republican party just called and told me to tell you they don't need your help they can screw up just fine all on their own.
2006-12-23 22:25:01 · update #1
One more thing there is a saying that goes like this ,"never bring a knife to a gun fight or you will surely lose". So when you go making critical statements about someone at least put a little more effort in making accurate observations so you don't look like a fool next time. Thanks
2006-12-23 22:39:56 · update #2
What is it that you don't get about the q&a format of Yahoo answers? let me see if I can help you ok ?
1st : I ask a question
You with me so far
2nd : You read my question
Still there?
3rd : You give me an answer to my question
Thats it. pretty simple , wouldn't you agree?
So lets see, I asked if you thought that Cheney was just doing damage control or dose he truly believe Rumsfeld was the greatest S.O.D to have ever served in that position. EVER . Now you tell me where in my question did you see anything about bill Clinton?
2006-12-23 23:09:06 · update #3
To take your statement a bit further, he also said Scooter Libby is one of the finest individuals he has ever known. Cheney also repeatedly stood by his statement that we would be greeted as liberators. Just how wrong can one administration be? After watching them in action for the past six years I have come to the conclusion Our President is a puppet, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld are his two arrogant, belligerent front men. There is something rotten in the republican party. They use the religious right wing zealots for votes and to create hatred amongst the rest of us to insure this country stays polarized and divided. It keeps our minds off of the dirty things they are doing. After over a half century of living and witnessing many misdeeds by many politicians, I can honestly say I am ashamed of my government. This President and this administration is the most corrupt and evil one I have ever had to suffer through, this includes Nixon. I used to get angry reading some of the republican bashers answers, now I just pity them. For anyone to say they support this President and this administration, they either have to be brain-dead or blind. How many examples of I don't give a phuck do they need to realize all American citizens are being sold down the drain. Correction, there is a small percentage who is benefiting from Mr. Bush being President. I hope their God forgives them, I never will. I think they hate America.
2006-12-23 23:15:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
He really loves Rumsfeld. They are in this Coup together and he thinks Rummy did a great job in helping taking over this country, spreading their Dominion over the Middle East etc. They are duping the public alright. They even trotted out Jim Baker, dad's pal, once again to bail the boy out. Last time it was in 2000 to seal the original Coup, now he came out to provide cover for the Iraq scandal. Now Dubbya can "reevaluate" the mess in Iraq and then continue doing the same thing for the next two years! Make no mistake, these guys are serious and good at fooling nearly everyone.
2006-12-23 23:32:32 · answer #2 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I trust your assertion. the two events, Democrat and Republican, are corrupt and packed with egocentric politicians who're greater frightened approximately their occupation than aggravating approximately what's terrific for the american human beings. it somewhat is a returned and forth conflict that the american human beings constantly lose. there's a reson there at the instant are not the different sturdy events. those 2 won't enable it so they are in a position to maintain their capability! human beings fall ill of Republicans so they vote in the Democrats who promise replace and a greater effective destiny. the only difficulty is as quickly as we decide them into workplace, they start up elevating taxes and increasing our government whilst they arise with excuses on why they are in a position to't fulfill the guarantees they made that have been given them there. Then we fall ill of Democrats and vote in Republicans. we are seeing this precise now with the Democrats we elected in the domicile and senate. They instructed us they could get us out of Iraq that's why human beings voted for them. I assure you we can nonetheless be in Iraq via the time we decide the subsequent president. and that i additionally assure if we decide a Democratic President, we can nonetheless be in Iraq in 2012. we can right here greater of a similar. returned and forth, returned and forth, same effects. Stupidity is doing a similar element persistently returned yet watching for a distinctive result. Sound known? we could give up electing those internationalists that have their own schedule and start up off electing authentic American Patriots! which will replace employer in Washington. If we shop electing human beings like the Bush's, Clinton's, Obama, McCain, Guiliani, and company, we can shop getting a similar failed rules and agendas. get up, permit your voice be heard! Vote Ron Paul for President in 2008!
2016-10-28 06:57:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cheney and Rumsfeld have been very good friend for many years. How do you think Rumsfeld got the job in the first place?
2006-12-24 00:41:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nice day dream.
Cheney was accurate. Rummy will go down in history as one of the greatest Secretary of States that we've ever had.
Only foreigners would not know that.
2006-12-23 23:16:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm sure the Repubs believe that Rummy was an absolutely fantastic patriot whose career was cut short by a secret campaign conducted by traitors in the "Democrat" party, and the Liberal media.
2006-12-23 22:07:59 · answer #6 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
ever consider that if clinton woudlve got off of his keister and responded to sudan about bin laden or responded to the us cole or the first attack on wtc this entire discussoin would be moot. remember if were talking about causes lets get to the real one. the british responded to the faulklands with quick brute force and bang..no more problem...clinton responded with a cigar and an intern and you can clearly see the results...you left wingers have no shame..none whatsoever.
2006-12-23 22:49:21 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Cheney is damage control. All he does is defend the misguided policies of the administration to which he serves. Bush spits up something stupid and Cheney comes out with mop in hand ready to clean up the lies in order to make them at least somewhat palatable.
2006-12-23 21:40:26 · answer #8 · answered by manbearpig 4 · 5⤊ 4⤋
When he's not having more surgery and so is hooked up to a heart-lung machine, you mean? Or when he is hiding out in an underground bunker? Or on a hunting his friends trip?
2006-12-23 22:09:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
damage control. rumsfeld wanted out long ago. was he really allowed to make his own decisions? i don't think so.
2006-12-24 00:36:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋