...Why wait for them to die off? We already have nukes.
Know what I mean, eh? Know what I mean? Nudge nudge wink wink hint hint.
2006-12-23 22:07:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by RedRay 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leaving the morality aside, this won't work. The undeveloped world already has a much higher death rate from disease and it has been like this for centuries. The 'rabble' as you call them breed faster than they die. History shows that when an undeveloped country becomes part of the rich world, the birth rate drops and the population stabilizes. Post war Japan is a good example. The way to halt overpopulation is to improve the economic situation, including health services, for the world's poorer nations.
2006-12-23 21:41:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
speaking of AIDS, the most area in this world that would benifit from the cure is the usa, so keeping the cure to themselves won't matter much to the rest of the world!
& about cancer, the usa isn't the only one that is trying to look for a cure!!! so they can keep it for all I care!
Stupid question, Thumbs Down!!
2006-12-23 21:48:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by CupCake 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well with-holding information is never a good thing anyway.
but there is already a cure for aids. One man with One Woman for One Lifetime. And Stay away from Blood.
Gee i should get a Nobel peace award ??
2006-12-23 22:23:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by fire 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. Knowledge is power and I want to help people as much as I possibly can. Weather I consider them riff raf or rabble, it doesn't matter. I believe that I should not judge people and should treat human life with the utmost respect.
2006-12-23 21:34:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by JackDaniels024 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Interesting theory but it would never happen, but who knows in the future when the worlds resources deplete. Such practises could be the norm.
2006-12-23 21:32:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i actually belive that we get these waves of killer illnessess to clense the earth, imagin if we did not die how the earth would die off due to over population and all that means, while its great we have cures for things esp when we have a loved one who has an illness, maybe that its not readily available to all either due to expense or knowledge is natures way of keeping tabs on its growth
2006-12-23 21:32:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by suzie1968uk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What if they denied this knowledge to us? You are assuming we are more intelligent! I think natural disasters will keep things in check. Very difficult to define 'the rabble' .
2006-12-23 21:39:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Spiny Norman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kinda dependent on how capitalist you are. I'm sure that would probably fall into the mass-murder category. But then again business is business.
2006-12-23 21:34:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Burpy Pete 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ah hello there is a cure for hiv remember magic johnson he was declared hiv free 5 yeaRS AGO you need lots of money .also 99% of cancer is treatable if caught early
2006-12-23 21:38:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by big_al225 2
·
0⤊
0⤋