2006-12-23 18:28:03 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
He's defo a Hewitt! Dna should be the order of the day here!
2006-12-23 18:45:24 · answer #1 · answered by crazeeladee no more 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Know what, if he was Hewitt's son, he is a son of love. If Charles' son, Princess Di loved him anyway. In addition, he looks a bit like Di's brother.
Finally, don't you think people who bring up this type of stuff need to
(1) Consider that the People of the UK are above this sort of "old biddy" speculation.
(2) Ought to respect Di's memory or at least Prince William's position sufficiently to put a sock in gobs, instead of BOTH feet half up the shanks...
This stuff really presents a nice image to the whole world, why not keep this sort of talk private... no not enough sense of privacy, self-respect, or class to do that?!
(3) and get a life. And imagine how horrible it would be for William if Harry had not been born, and thus was not present when their mother died.
Slanderous, wretched blathering hags, the lot of you, male and females. Pathetic!
--Charles "That Cheeky Lad" Abbey and Angel
2006-12-24 06:10:34 · answer #2 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Harry Hewitt iss Diana common law vife off Dodi Fayad son, how Hewitt and Prinse Whales haf son? is bofe mens, Stupit questing
2006-12-24 09:31:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Their have always been royal bas-tards, so nothing new there.
Diana was a well documented philanderer who had lots of Lovers (Hewit, Will Carling, Oliver Hoare to name a few) during her marriage to Prince Charles.
Keeping quiet about this out of respect for the Monarchy is a bit of a joke, as it is the 'subjects' who have to support this family. If you are paying for this family you want the real thing, not a cuckoo in the nest.
The royal family have already DNA tested Harry, but will not reveal the results. One wonders why.
His dubious parentage is not his fault, but he should be forced to give up any claim to the throne and certainly should not receive any money from the civil list.
2006-12-24 07:29:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He totally looks like Hewitt, but I agree that it might be something from his mother's side.
If I was betting, I'd say that Charles is his father. But I would not be shocked to learn that he isn't.
We'll never know because there will never be a DNA test.
2006-12-24 05:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Now that would be a interesting episode of the Jeremy Kyle show and the D N A result shows that Charles is ******
2006-12-24 02:39:04 · answer #6 · answered by cliffhanger 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, I don't have to nor do I admit that Harry looks anything like Hewitt.
Secondly, if you think for a second that the Establishment would allow an impostor to be 3rd in line to the throne you are a bigger idiot than I think you are. (Ever heard of DNA testing?)
Thirdly, check your typing, it says a lot about you.
2006-12-24 08:16:37 · answer #7 · answered by Raymo 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
always thought that, there was a newspaper that even put the 2 of them side by side once and they have so many points of similarity... chances of the royals checking the dna... 0 but whats new, if we followed the royal family line as it should be including all the children to mistresses, we would probably have a king who came from Manchester!!
2006-12-24 03:11:21 · answer #8 · answered by suzie1968uk 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
There's no way Harry is Hewitt's son. Look at him facially (forget about the red hair) and there is no mistaking who his father is.
2006-12-24 02:44:04 · answer #9 · answered by waggy 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Diana's brother... (is it Earl Spencer ?) has red hair too. So its pretty feasible that Harry's red hair comes through genetic coding from Diana's side of family tree.
2006-12-24 02:33:17 · answer #10 · answered by Joe Bloggs 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋