We got saddam hussein, so why dont we leave iraq again?

Question

The other day , bush said " We will remain in iraq to stop the terrorists, " I never remember 9/11 happening cause of Iraqis. Also, why dont we do something about this, our troops are getting killed for oil? this is a no no no.

Answer 1

there are no obvious logical reasons dont look for them
the truth is very deeply hidden
the people behind Bush are the Masonic illuminati .their origin was Babylon and their ancesters came from Semuria ,all these places were in Irak and Iran,as wel, as the site of the garden of Eden ,the city of Mu and Ur
there are many secrets still to be uncovered here
Maybe they want to protect these secrets as well as controlling the place of their origins and the cradle of humanity
apàrt from that the mother of all oil wells is here ,
and some sources say that the situation is also a smoke screen for other activities of this power structure that they wish to hide from the worlds view
so your guess is as good as mine ,many possible reasons

the illuminati plans centuries ahead .and they armed saddam in the first place all the time knowing what they would be doing now ,many years later

Saddam was just a patsy in an elaborate complicated political game that has been going on for many of hundreds of years
the general public only sees what is in front of them at the moment .
we cannot see the wood for the trees ,and that is the intention

dont for a minute believe that the public of the nation is of concern to the elite controlling it
(the eye in the piramid)
the elites are related to the other elites of other groups of people and are loyal to them ,the masses below are are cannon fodder

Answer 2

good question but iam afraid all the answers are as if peopl want to circumvent the main issue . the reason behind the attack and the reason of prolonging the stay .
the reason for attack was WMD as an open subject and the link of saddam with Bin Laden. both these issues have been proved wrong and no further evidence have been found even after raidin of iraq and there after.
so whats the reason to attack and the justification of removing saddam from power ?
non other then the attrocities he commited on his own people. if u can plan 20 yrs in advance and foresee the and prepare for eventualities then y cant they do for this situation also ?
the reason is clear US interfears every where but havent solved a problem any where in has gone and left with more mess then before ?
there r many examples of this and the reason is very simple it has the best weapon manufacturing units and it has to keep them busy . the policy is clear creat problems and leave for the arms race to go on which will give business to their industries . if there is peace in the world who will buy wepons ?

Answer 3

If we pulled out of Iraq the sectarian violence would escalate, and thousands more would be killed. This isn't about a power trip or anything, keeping troops in Iraq until a stable government can be put in place is the only viable way that anyone, to my knowledge, has been able to come up with to attempt to prevent more violence. Not only this, but we have succeeded in destabilizing Iraq. If left to their own defenses, the country would flounder, and fail. Sunni and Shiite Muslims seem to be incapable of working together, therefore it appears that they would be unlikely to come up with a way to create a viable, stable government.

Also, the notion that Americans are fighting over there for oil is an opinion. I personally believe that the government was not sure that there were no WMDs, as we now know there aren't, but I also believe that this was never an attempt to take control of the oil. Notice that after the war began, oil prices spiked, and are just now beginning to drop.

The government is attempting to come up with a way to pull troops out of Iraq, or to temporarily increase the number of troops there in an attempt to stabilize the country, turn it over to the Iraq military, and bring our men home.

Answer 4

I think it's dumb to attack the asker; he's got a valid point. Maybe you should be reading about what's going on.

The idea of a power vaccuum is correct. But for people who think we're not over there for oil; why were contracts awarded to companies with ties to the government? (ex. Halliburton) Although Saddam was a thorn in our side, 9 of the 15 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi Arabian. Why are we not over there if we're fighting terror. It seems like it'd do more good, wouldn't it?

Answer 5

Saddam would be accomplished because of the fact the West and the family participants of his victims call for it. He could of constantly been the Martyr regardless of if he were killed combating Coalition forces, or were assassinated or saved in reformatory. Arabs to no longer desire to get entangled with Iraq's issues and as quickly as the Coalition forces depart there will be a civil war , with the Shia as winners.they're going to connect forces with Iran, u.s. will then be returned as quickly as returned yet this time Syria additionally gets entangled and this could be yet another 10 years of combating with out winners, basically greater lifeless harmless civilians and greater hatred unfold for the time of the international. Why cant all of us appreciate one yet another and survive a peace complete planet.

Answer 6

(real terrorists are bush and his father ,, bush supports isreal )
international community did not approve iraq war .
bush never want to stop terrorist , he just want to get access to
iraq oil resourses.
from other side ,iran is a country that never accept the essence
of isreal ----- of course the main answer is iran .
your troops are getting killed because some assholes like bush and olmert want to stress on iran
i am an iranian . i will be pleased if you contact me with my mail.

Answer 7

you do have a point because I don't think Iraq had anything to do with 9-11

Answer 8

It's called a power vacuum, when you take someone such as a dictator out of power, there's a huge hole left with everyone fighting to be next in power, were there to make sure that transition goes smooth and fair.

Answer 9

have you ever heard of vietnam, same thing, the political learders in charge cant leave, but they wont commit the necessary force to actually win the war; besides the whole thing was about saddam trying to kill bush I, not about terrorism, so my friends and yours have to go over to do w's revenge mission,

Answer 10

We're making a Iranian sandwich. We're about to take a bite.
I can't believe how ignorant Paul is.