On these boards I have seen many requests for registered sex offenders in locales parents have just moved to. The problem with this thinking (and one that has been perpetutated by politicians and the media employing scare tactics) is that your child's greatest risk is from offenders who haven't been identified. The US Department of Justice shows that of all the 15,000 or so cases of child sexual abuse annually, only four percent are committed by people listed on the registry; the other 96 percent are "newbies" to the sex offender status. Another statistic is that the number of stranger snatching child numbers about 50 a year, compared to the above mentioned 15,000. A third statistic is that sex offenders, contrary to reported media statistics, have a recidivism rate of as low as 3.5 to a high of 20 percent. Not anywhere the 80 to 90 percent recidivism rate spouted by laymen often.
Parents, any comments?
2006-12-23
13:07:46
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Shelley
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I can't get the image of the parent diligently looking for sex offender risks to their children while the favorite uncle, coach, teacher, babysitter, day care teacher, family friend or someone the child or family already knows is molesting the child and the parent doesn't have a clue.
2006-12-23
13:09:19 ·
update #1
To respond to questions: Source is US Department of Justice, as stated in the question.
I am not suggesting to not use the Megan's List as a possible source. But don't think that the only people parents need to worry about are those on the list. I am also suggesting to not verbally or physically harass those who are.
To the denigrating responder - I am an English teacher who know someone listed on Megan's List and who cares about fairness to alMF
2006-12-23
15:43:40 ·
update #2