2006-12-23 12:55:17 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not everybody who goes to Yale and Harvard is smart. Ask George W. Bush. Bin Laden must be smarter.
2006-12-23 20:46:06 · answer #1 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden in a heart beat. I'm not saying that either one of them is "moral" by my standards, but basic smarts???
Edit: Pardon, cynthiatw, but the question wasn't about "cowardly" & there are MANY ways to kill. If Iraq was in hell before, it's worse now. I wonder if it's worse to be a coward, or stand up & face the country & say there can be no "graceful withdrawal" with plans to grind out more young people through the sausage machine who are NOT even prepared. Listen to the military, to the guys who have been over there. Oh never mind, I'm losing focus.
Edit: So many cogent answers & I gave so many thumbs up. I guess the 3 who gave me thumbs down just didn't understand my logic. But the recent answer of noname247 sort of saved the day with "...Bush gets mad & attacks someone else's country..." & that's it in a nutshell.
2006-12-23 13:25:53 · answer #2 · answered by Psychic Cat 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Although totally evil, Bin Laden's early morning bowel movement is smarter than Bush.
2006-12-23 14:13:41 · answer #3 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It really galls me: a question comparing a murdering bastard sob evil snake devil and the president. How dare you compare murdering 3000 innocent children, men and women at the WTC ,a place of horror and devastation ,because some insane lunatic loves evil,and fighting a war to free captive slaves of a dictator and free them from Isalamic radicals who only live to destroy the way of life that you so enjoy and all you believe in and every freedom you have! This just is not a question that can be answered rationally. There is nothing to answer because it fails as any kind of a good question. That is my sincere opinion.
2006-12-23 14:15:34 · answer #4 · answered by Bijous 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The fact that the U.S. went into Afghanistan for the express purpose of finding Bin Laden in 2001, have hounded other foreign intelligence agencies for info and tortured untold numbers of "enemy combatants" for information regarding Bin Laden's whereabouts and still have not found him makes this a no brainer: Bin Laden.
2006-12-23 13:06:24 · answer #5 · answered by Ross M 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
bin laden because supposedly did the 911 and bush gets mad and attacks someone elses country.....how did that happen...lol he got saddam, but bid laden is free chillen in the desert
2006-12-23 14:58:18 · answer #6 · answered by noname247 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
I hate Bin Laden more though.
2006-12-23 14:46:48 · answer #7 · answered by cruel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden blames the U.S. for keeping him from making billions of dollars, so he is unhappy with his millions. Bush on the other hand doesn't have a clue and doen't care either. Just like his Dad. Which makes the axiom 'Like Father, Like Son' truer in their cases than at any other time in our history. I mean where else can you live in Maine and not pay taxes because your legal residence is in Texas.
2006-12-23 13:26:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bin Laden lives in a cave in hiding. Yup a virtual genius!
2006-12-23 12:57:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Bin Laden...he has outsmarted Bush for his entire Presidency
2006-12-23 12:56:55 · answer #10 · answered by fade_this_rally 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋