English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I like the guy!!!!!!!!!!! and i compare them two!!!

Everyone thinks comparing them is a bad thing but both men had the best of intentions. Both men did what they thought was right, what would help their loyal people succeed, what would make their and all life better for the people who previously worked for it a reward, so on and so forth.

I mean seriously... hitler wanted to get rid of all races and such other then his own, in america if we thru out all hispanics and blacks that would cut our poor class by about 75% and the last 25% that are white would take their jobs, not to mention a drastic decrease in crime... now as good as that sounds, its not very nice and not even republicans like myself are that mean anymore, but the idea looked good on paper and so did the iraq war.

2006-12-23 11:13:21 · 13 answers · asked by TJ815 4 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Bush is trying to bring democracy to Iraq. He is not committing genocide.

Hitler was trying to take over the world and he committed genocide - the Holocaust - the killing of 6 million Jews, and killings of other people as well - homosexuals, Gypsies, Poles, and many others as well.

I think it is a great disservice and injustice to compare Bush with an evil person such as Hitler.

2006-12-24 00:42:26 · answer #1 · answered by happy inside 6 · 0 1

the same causes Libs imagine those who do not help Obama are racist. There extremely are not any good causes, that's basically the way Libs don't have any valid causes, so as that they strive against to shout the different get at the same time down. The solutions listed decrease than are a suitable get at the same time. they don't supply any causes, very few short sentences there'll be the predictable ones, erroneous as they are. comparing Hitler's meant Christianity with Bush, so as that they should be the same! Hitler hated Christianity almost as a lot as he hated Judaism. actual Hitler gave extra comprehend to Islam. Jan Brewer replaced right into a Nazi because she would not choose her state over-run with illegals who will call for amenities and entitlements. yet that would not make experience both, because the Nazi's would were checking any and anybody and jailing them for the slightest offenses.

2016-12-01 03:11:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This is my response to a similarly posed question about such a comparison.

Why do people say that President Bush is comparable to Hitler?

Because both failed at creating their ideal worlds through war.

The difference between these 2 men that liberals who bring up this comparison fail to realize is that Bush went to war to make countries where everyone would be equal, while Hitler went to war to make nearby countries into satellites of Aryanism, where people of all other races are subordinated to people of the perfect but extinct Aryan race of which Hitler believed the Germans were heirs.

So as anyone can see, the 1 similarity of these 2 men, when looked at closer, is actually reflective of extreme differences between them.

2006-12-23 11:21:27 · answer #3 · answered by STILL standing 5 · 2 0

People who compare Hitler and Bush have absolutely no idea what or who Hitler was. Those who do know and still make the comparison are only taking shots because they don't like Bush and would not be able to validate the comparison if put to the test. They were both elected to office and there the comparison stops.

2006-12-23 11:27:05 · answer #4 · answered by doobie 4 · 3 1

Because no one knew them both on a personal basis. They don't have enough fact, so they base their opinion on emotion. Hitler was Hitler. Bush is Bush. There is one big difference between the two. Hitler is dead. Bush is alive. How well he is doing is another queston for thought, that is relevant to todays events.

2006-12-23 11:32:32 · answer #5 · answered by DAVID T 3 · 1 0

Ok, I will answer this with the least possible prejudice. Many people compare the two because of the Holocaust and the amount of dead Iraqi citizens there has been. We can all agree no matter what party that Iraq is a disaster, we can agree that we are there now and something should be done, now it is time to unite and figure out a plan that would work, cost the least amount of dead troops and ultimately create a stable Iraq and bring our Heroes home.

2006-12-23 11:17:00 · answer #6 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 1 3

Maybe because the Presidene's grandfather, Prescott Bush, was a major financier of Hitler.

2006-12-23 11:42:17 · answer #7 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1 2

It's too bad Yahoo closed the message boards, all of the trolls are apparently finding a new home here on "Yahoo Answers."

Let us prepare ourselves for more racism, ignorance and hate mongering.

2006-12-23 12:01:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sethco 3 · 1 1

This is a sick post. Our greatness comes through our diversity.

There's plenty of crime done by whites, too.

Please wake up!

2006-12-23 11:30:56 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0 1

I am going to assume that your question is a joke. But, if it's not, I can only hope that you kill yourself immediately.

2006-12-23 11:19:16 · answer #10 · answered by Ross L 2 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers