English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It got revealed that Nifong held back DNA evidence showing the stripper had been with several men, but none of them the Duke students who voluntarily waived their rights and gave DNA samples to the DA. Now it turns out that the stripper has given several different accounts of what happened that night, and is not sure intercourse occured.(HINT: You can not charge someone with rape if there is no intercourse). So you have a gold digger dancer who hoped to file a civil suit against the players, and a publicity hungry DA who ignored(refused to interview) credible alibi witness testimony and instead charged these young men with rape and kidnapping. These young men who went to college to better themselves are now screwed. With rape and kidnapping charges on their records, who will hire them. Also,the next time a woman legitimently gets raped, people will be skeptical because of this, so women lose too. Opinions? Suggestions and email addresses of who to complain to about this appreciated.

2006-12-23 09:57:35 · 2 answers · asked by Michael S 3 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

2 answers

I don't know if he should be disbarred but he should lose his job in the D.A.'s office.

2006-12-23 10:00:31 · answer #1 · answered by jim h 6 · 1 0

ought to he be disbarred? No. i do no longer believe so. IMHO, he basically befell to do publicly what others have executed privately while their situations have not been so intense profile. He ought to, despite the fact that, get replaced as District lawyer. certainly one of the different solutions asked despite if or no longer he did it because of the fact the folk who elected him demanded he do it. I say easily no longer. various the events for that reason got here in the previous his re-election campaign. He did it because of the fact he had to win votes.. or a minimum of no longer lose any. He had to do despite grew to become into mandatory to cover up that he had insisted on prosecuting what had constantly been a vulnerable, if no longer non-existent case. He additionally could no longer replace his techniques and drop rates in the previous the election for worry of being seen as incompetent or wishy-washy. What particularly burned my biscuits so which you ought to communicate is the certainty while the particularly some non-accused group contributors refused to testify or despite, he went and bring them up on previous rates against them that could have remained on the shelf. It grew to become into particularly minor stuff, which to be truthful i do no longer remember the specifics of. It grew to become into petty and it grew to become into vindictive.

2016-11-23 13:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers