and did they use WTC Building 7 as their "Command Post" and then blow it up afterward?
2006-12-23 08:34:40 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was an integral part of that tragedy, make no mistake about it.
2006-12-23 08:39:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
No, he had no part in 911
And WTC 7 was fulling engulfed in fire from the debris from WTC 1 that fell on top of it. Since it had a counterveillance lobby (first six floors) and diesel fuel line that ran through the fifth floor, in combination with the damage it sustained from wTC 1 collapsing on it, and the fires that were UNFOUGHT for 7 hours;; all of thse factors contributed to its collapse
Please educate yourself instead of repeating the lies of conspiracy theorists.
2006-12-23 15:41:33 · answer #2 · answered by arus.geo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have heard this before and nobody seems to be able to come up with any proof. I can't think of a reason why Bush would stage an attack that would draw a lot of criticism to him and kill thousands of innocent people. While Bush's foreign policies and inadequate national security policies undoubtedly played a role in these attacks, I am fairly certain that he himself did not want this to happen.
2006-12-23 08:41:06 · answer #3 · answered by pctorab 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Get off the weed, it's starting to make you paranoid and delusional.
Your question is completely nuts.
However, their predetermined plan to invade Iraq was given a boost due to the "war on terror" created by this event.
2006-12-23 08:43:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it is my opinion that such a conspiracy would have had to have been so deep that we would have more solid evidence by now. I don't like GW as a president but I find it hard to believe that any president would participate in such an act of blatant treason.
Max
2006-12-23 09:47:29 · answer #5 · answered by Max S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here's something old, you are delusional. How many more of these stupid conspiracy theories are we going to have to hear from you Bush haters. You idiots want to blame him for everything. I can actually envision the scene in the trailer you call home;
"Hey Maw, the toilet's backed up again!"
"Oh my God, it must be because George Bush is President!"
"That's right Maw, that's the reason Daddy's strung out on crack,. George Bush made him smoke it."
2006-12-23 08:41:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is old stuff - nothing new about it - pops up every other day on here. Even though Bush is an idiot and a fool, he had nothing to do with 9/11.
2006-12-23 08:39:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe this will ever be proven true, Vigilante justice is very much alive and well in this country, and those few involved would be dealt with in a most permanent way.....
2006-12-23 08:40:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, actually no longer. purely with the aid of fact some human beings opt to desperately have self assurance in a conspiracy concept for rather some reasons, does not make it so. The information that human beings use to help their claims is in keeping with a million/2 truths, questionable information, and purely ordinary lies. the only group that attacked america, greater suitable america and her allies to have interplay contained in the conflict on terror, totally rests with Al-Qaeda who've used Islam to further their evil. those theories will in basic terms get greater extensive unfold and absurd with time. purely as some have attempted to declare that the Holocaust is a hoax, human beings will proceed to attempt to warp history and try in charge america for the assaults.
2016-12-18 18:18:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They didn't orchestrate it. But they sure knew somethign was going to happen before hand and used it as the reason to get into Iraq and other countries.
2006-12-23 08:38:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No....They were duped. The bad guys were smarter than us...Whats new about this question??? Its been going around for 5 years......Who killed JFK??? after 43 years, who cares?
2006-12-23 08:42:33 · answer #11 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋