2006-12-23 08:27:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Please do not say, Bin Laden admitted to this. Ask any detective and they will confirm that they do not take the admission of a killer seriously without any proof. Ask the government, "Where's the beef (proofs)?" beyond the claims.
2006-12-23 09:00:52 · update #1
hmm. John michael karr also took responsibility for jon benet's death yes he didnt take down two towers and thousands of lives but there is still questions to be asked in the events of September 11th, it feels the media is satisfied with "admitting" to a crime.
2006-12-26 12:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by crystalclear72000 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good God... do you people need it laid out for you ? Go to the 9/11 Commission's Report... note the connections to those who flew the airplanes to bin Laden. Read the transcripts of the TAPES where bin Laden exalts his plan. Go take a course in Arabic and LISTEN to the tapes.
Note his PREVIOUS planning and direction of other attacks.
Oh, and detectives (and DA's and Juries) used to LOVE confessions until bleeding-heart liberal judges changed the rules and have now almost OUTLAWED the admissibility of the confession
2006-12-23 09:55:16 · answer #2 · answered by mariner31 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
probably for the same reason Obama received't produce his vault beginning certificate and tries to fool us into wondering he has already performed so with the help of showing that questionable "certification of stay beginning." that's, the U. S. did not have any data to coach the Taliban, and Obama probably would not have a vault beginning certificate. Edit: i seen some thing else. that is a chance that the finished Al-Quaeda element replaced right into a ruse to invade a rustic (Afghanistan) believed to have a lot of oil. at the same time as the Afghanistan deposits proved to be a lot smaller than initially replaced into anticipated, Iraq (which had large proved oil reserves) grew to change into the U. S. authorities's next sufferer. it is also a chance that Bush staged 9-11 to make a terrorist team called "Al-Quaeda" seem to exist, or if it does exist to make it seem a lot extra threatening than that's. This deception has had all forms of area-reward for the large authorities gang, which includes justifying Patriot, Patriot II, invasions human beings electorate' privateness (e.g., unwarranted wiretaps), strip searches and drug checks the position they were once not deemed necessary, person-friendly justifications for the abuses of electorate with the help of federal policemen, govt orders that ought to turn the U. S. right into a military dictatorship, and the introduction of the dept of fatherland safe practices to do the pastime that the dept of protection replaced into created to do, beforehand it were given sidetracked in a lot of underhanded wars. about Osama bin encumbered, did you keep in mind that the files media has shown pictures of more beneficial than one guy who replaced into reported to be he? Yup. there is the authentic Osama that you said once in a lengthy time period on television, and there is the stooge that the media or the authorities phonied up so as that they can make their words seem to come back out of bin encumbered's mouth.
2016-12-01 03:06:00 · answer #3 · answered by marconi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question has been asked over and over and OVER. We already know the answer--by Bin Laden's OWN ADMISSION. What you should be reading is Gore Vidal's book `Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace'. In it Gore describes the innumerable wars the U.S has waged on other countries--one after the other without ceasing, for years and years and years. I do not condone Bin Laden's crime--but you must ask about the (proveable) relationship between Bin Laden and G.W. Bush---and THEN ask why Bin Laden has never been caught.
2006-12-23 08:50:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Let's see now. We have Bin Laden's own tapes in which he not only admits to his compatriots that this was his plan but rejoices in the fact that he miscalculated the results, which were much more dramatic and extensive than he thought they would be.
Not enough for you? Well, how about the number of other world leaders who have received all kinds of security and intelligence briefings on this one, and who therefore either joined the fight in Afghanistan or allowed active participants to use their territory and to fly through their airspace.
Some things are never published or are published only decades later, and for one very significant reason - the public doesn't have the security clearance.
Now, please see your doctor about your paranoid tendencies.
2006-12-23 09:26:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Even Bill Clinton knew/knows and admits it was Bin Laden. At least that's what I heard him say last time I listened to him trying to burnish his legacy.
2006-12-23 08:38:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bin Ladden took responsibility for the bombings.You living under a rock or something?
2006-12-23 08:36:00 · answer #7 · answered by sunny 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
...Umm...The proof comes from Bin Laden's videotapes in which he was bragging about the World Trade Center coming down which were sent to Al-Jazeera and aired worldwide...
2006-12-23 08:35:57 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
don't you ever pay attention to what is going on around you? bin laden took credit for the bombings, you really need to start checking your facts
2006-12-25 12:37:15 · answer #9 · answered by Shira 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So I guess the video tape released by Bin Laden, proclaiming that it was Al-Quedas plan isn't enough for you?
2006-12-23 08:36:43 · answer #10 · answered by FRANKFUSS 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋