No, the lowest has been under this President. Do not forget that when clinton left office we were in a full recession.
2006-12-23 07:17:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
No, but some of the unemployment rates during the Clinton years, were the lowest in the last 40 years.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm
2006-12-23 07:24:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
To Ronin. so a great way as a funds surplus under Clinton, take his final funds on your CPA and enable him show you techniques it replaced into "Balanced" he will snigger you out of the room. He ran the comparable deficits as another President. He blanketed the "Peace Dividend: with a "Projected" 20 12 months impression assuming no substitute. He blanketed the then "Social protection Surplus" interior the final Accounting funds" which no different President ever did, and that's now unlawful (by using Clinton) to try this lower back. And he shortend maturities on Gov. debt, which decreased outgoing money bypass on the time, yet could expenses of pastime ever strengthen, he will have placed usa in a horribly susceptible place. Take some Econ, and Accounting, then attempt your argument lower back... the respond to the question is surely Bush/Cheney.
2016-10-18 22:18:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...I think, if I remember the stats correctly that the best unemployment rate when Clinton was pres was about 6.2%, currently it is around 5.4%...and several times in the last 25 years it has been in the 4's.
2006-12-23 07:27:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Robert J 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
Whether it was or not the president can't spend money to stimulate the economy or squeeze it to cause recession without the approval of Congress. The Congress was Republican the whole time.
2006-12-23 07:29:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes it was. In the town I live in you had maybe one person you knew who was unemployed under this president pretty much everyone I know is unemployed or working low paying jobs just to pay their bills and I do mean just their bills. At times barely that.
2006-12-23 07:21:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by curyouss1 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
It will be the highest when the next prez gets in and we have to pay down our national debt.....here comes the next big recession,hope you have some money saved.
2006-12-23 07:21:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you want to see a real comparison between the Clinton/Bush economies go here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15253047/
2006-12-23 07:34:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anji 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lower than with the present administration. It is 4.5 now, was under 4 then. However, our economy was in WAY better shape, and our national debt was cut drastically. Now we are in the deepest hole ever.
2006-12-23 07:15:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I really don't know for sure, but if Bush gets his guest worker program I know who will have the higest American unemployment rate in history for his terms.
2006-12-23 07:19:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by twin2jerry 2
·
2⤊
2⤋