Basically, go blow if you are a deadbeat parent. You have obligations, you can't meet them, you should be sterilized and sent on your merry way.
Sorry, venting about my deadbeat brother.
2006-12-23 07:07:03 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I agree with the sterilization part, but what ever assests they have, whatever, they should be confiscated and sold, and any denefits "If the bum works", shuld also be seized and along with any insurance bebefits and social security benefits, and retirement bebefits. The children did not choose to be in this world, and since we made that decesion for then, then its our responsibility to provide the best that we can for them. For them!!!!!!
2006-12-23 07:23:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I agree with you. I am sure they find money to do other things they want to do but yet do not pay child support! I have an ex who is a deadbeat. As for the kids yes they get hurt a lot. It also hurts them when you tell them you can not afford things and you are already working 2 jobs and their dad works but will not pay! As for hotlil14u why should he be able to meet someone else and have kids when he did not support the other ones! Will he do it all over again? Yes he will.
2006-12-23 08:55:05 · answer #2 · answered by d3midway semi-retired 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Truly, I don't care how it affects the parent. I only care about the children. I would look out for the best interests of the child. If it would be better for them to no longer have that person as a parent (who cares about losing financial support if they're not paying anyway), then I would take them away. If the parent is really trying and doing the best they can, then I would offer them programs that would help them GET BACK ON THEIR FEET, but making sure the children are taken care of no matter what. I don't believe in hand-outs, but I also don't think that children should suffer because of the actions of a parent.
2006-12-23 07:17:02 · answer #3 · answered by yowhatdoyouwant 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I won the lottery. My ex wife sued for increased child support. Then she said if I let her new husband, the guy she left me for, adopt my son I would never have to pay a dime. When we went to court she testified that she wanted our son to have the latest designer jeans at age 5. This was the only thing he was missing. In later years, she would call if the check was late and say she needed it before she left on her vacation to Hawaii. Once I fell five months behind and when I paid up, she bought a new Miata. "Deadbeat" can mean alot of things and to categorize everyone who may be a deadbeat under the law does a disservice to those of us who got in over our heads. By the way, my son is now of legal age and I don't owe her a cent.
2006-12-23 07:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by Joe M 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
first of all that's in basic terms no longer adult adult males that are deadbeats there are various lady are to. lady % to ***** all the time that they dont get money this and that. what do you think of lady did until now there the place baby help. thats maximum surprising they worked adn took care of them childrens there self. lady say all the time i can do all of it by ability of myself if it is so then why dont you. as a replace you % to assert he's a loser deadbeat m f-er. adn on and on. so do sense gulity yet there those that would desire to handle that no longer you. in specific circumstances you dont additionally be attentive to the great reason they won't pay. lady is all in regards to the money with it first of all. no longer something to do with the baby. if i had to furnish a % on which childrens see there baby help money i could say 15% and thats even pushing it there. and specific i can work out why maximum adult adult males dont % to pay it. adn what do you somewhat classifed and ineffective beat first of all? i be attentive to lots of adult adult males that pay baby help purchase dont get to work out the baby so i assume that makes them a ineffective beat. adn lady make so no longer difficulty-free for the baby to even have realationship with there baby or childrens first of all. thats why some dont difficulty to return around doesnt cause them to a ineffective beat however. childrens do ask question whilst they grow previous and that they consistently locate out the fact one way or yet another. as a replace of thinking in regards to the money how in regards to the baby. and you women individuals be attentive to who you're that that's all in regards to the money and that's not in any respect in regards to the baby. that's approximately you. ineffective beat mothers gets away with much extra then a mans does. i hate the great baby help any procedures. they'd desire to alter it so some distance as im concern. if lady % to be a equivalent then the comparable element would desire to be surpassed to you as for the guy. pay like a guy and so on.
2016-12-11 14:54:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's every parents responsibility to TRY and support thier children, I know people who support thier kids and can't afford to pay thier own rent in the process, but kids come first.
Putting deadbeats in jail don't help the kids, putting them to work does! if they can't find work, the government should assist in finding some form of work. but Surrendering the rights should be an option also .
2006-12-23 08:45:23 · answer #6 · answered by Al 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Deadbeat parents make me so irate! I don't understand the purpose of having kid after kid if you can't even take care of the first one. And even if you didn't plan it, you knew what the consequences would be. So peopel should stop making excuses & take responsibility. It's not about you anymore!
I do beleive in second chances...but after the 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc...how much longer should a child have to wait for an ADULT to get their act together? It's not fair!
So yes, relinquish your "parental" rights to someone who does care.
2006-12-23 07:17:20 · answer #7 · answered by georgiadiva 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It is the case that parents who neglect their children, may well have them taken away.
It is often the case though that there is a lack of opportunity for many less fortunate than ourselves.
There seems to be a desire within some of the middle classes to tread on those below, to deny them opportunity, to deny them a reasonable minimum wage.
In the richest country in the world, parents should not have to work two jobs and hardly ever see their children in order to survive, And therefore it is not surprising that some people choose not to work for a pittance, and instead rely on benefits.
I wouldn't underestimate the effect inequality, and the downright callousness of the well-off in society has on the poor.
2006-12-23 07:16:18 · answer #8 · answered by Ringo G. 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
If you don't want to take care of your kids than they should be takin away from you. But I don't feel any has a right to say you can't have kids and sterilize a person because they could eventually get themselves together and find a stable person to be with and because they were sterilized a chance of giving this person a child would be taken away from both.
2006-12-23 07:17:06 · answer #9 · answered by curyouss1 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I agree. If they've had more than 2 chances to clean up their act and properly care for their kids, it's time for them to have their reproductive organs removed and rights of ever taking care of anyone stripped away.
2006-12-23 07:12:10 · answer #10 · answered by NBinGP 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋