Obama or Hillary would be on that list if they somehow someway win
2006-12-23 11:51:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by John 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
Can you explain what makes you think Clinton was a bad president? All I remember were those 8 horrible years of national peace and prosperity. I mean, we didn't even fight a real war! What a waste, huh? Why even have an army if we're not going to mix it up? Sure, everyone made more money, and we had a national surplus to pay off the deficit, but that's WAY less important than what he did with his secretary, right?
The worst presidents of the last 50 years: Bush II, Reagan (tricke-down economics alone was sinful, the war on drugs was an embarassment), LBJ (escalating Vietnam based on a lie; sound familiar?), Carter (not that he was bad, but he just didn't do anything when he should have).
2006-12-23 07:01:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
in no way. Worse, a procession of GOP presidents has consistently been an economic curler coaster. The era after the Civil war (1875 - 1910) became no longer something yet in no way-ending economic bubble and burst. So became the Nineteen Twenties. Ditto the 1980's through right this moment. Giving Wall highway the liberty to act with decrease than helpful oversight is a risky element.
2016-12-11 14:53:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"the Loser trio"
Trio? Go back to elementary school and learn how to count.
Will there be a more pathetic president than Carter and Clinton? Yes, George W. Bush & his father are 10X more pathetic.
2006-12-23 06:56:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by LaissezFaire 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why yes. Both President Bush's. Hey Bozo, here are some newsflashes for you. We had an election & you guys lost. There are no WMD's in Iraq. Bush/ Cheney/ Rumsfeld have lied many times about the illegal stunts they have pulled. Try watching something other than Fox News. Some news agenceys report news stories that have some truth in them
2006-12-23 07:17:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by donronsen 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Carter and Clinton were average, at least. There have been some disasters, among others.. Hayse, Ray-gun and Nixon. But the former are gravely insulted if they are compared to the current illegal occupant, Dictator Dumbya, the scumbag of the earth!!!
2006-12-23 08:41:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Monica has no input in national matters what so ever. She was just a toy that got caught up in the train wreck of the clinton regime. Carter was more pathetic politically because everything he touched turned to **** and he wasn't smart enough to start leaving **** alone. Clinton was a moral pig disaster, but at least he was smart enough to not touch anything. Which he didn't.
2006-12-23 07:01:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Who Cares
I throw my worn out socks away. Those guys are only good for Michael Bechlov and his crew.
I'm looking in the right now and want some 2007 results. Those retired buffoons can not help them selves let along get Bush in restraints or a straight jacket where he belongs.
Go big Red Go
Go big Red Go
2006-12-23 07:00:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A trio is three people ur thinkin Duo
and only time will tell. This wasn't a good question to ask on a place like this, I bet you that at least 15 people will say george bush.
2006-12-23 06:57:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by obsessive_writer 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Clinton balanced the budget for two years...I'm still waiting for Bush's first balance. I don't like Clinton, but Carter failed because he had a Republican Senate, and G Bush was using the CIA to block everything he tried to do.
Pathetic would be G W Bush, Cuz he has no idea what he is doing.
2006-12-23 06:59:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well since you only named two presidents neither in my book but there is two that can take thier place Bush and Bush
2006-12-23 07:04:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by curyouss1 2
·
1⤊
0⤋