If the USA was to be nuked, would democrats want us to still talk to the terrorists?

Answer 1

They wouldn't even care as long as they didn't hit an abortion clinic or a Starbucks.

Answer 2

Ok, here's how you have to break this down.

Nukes are weapons, yes? Weapons are used in wars. Wars tend to escalate in their levels of violence. So, yes, of course, talk. Because, the ONLY alternative is more war, and more nukes. And more and more and more until the whole world is poisoned.

This is a very simple concept, really. You can extrapolate it to a beginning with just about any type of weapon you want. If you start out throwing rocks at your enemies, you can really see a high body count before you step it all the way up to nukes. The point is, eventually you'd better be prepared to start talking, or you're gonna wind up with a real mess on your planet.

It's pretty amazing that there are still people in the world who believe it's possible to isolate the consequences of widespread violence and war to a small area. If there was ever a lesson to be learned from human history, it's that the consequences of war and hatred resonate down through centuries of human development.

The violence we are seeing today has as it's root causes exactly the same issues which have caused violence and war for thousands of years; famine, disease, poverty, religion, corruption in government. We have the means to dispel these problems, but not if we use weapons instead of words. Unless, as apparently is the case with far too many people, your solution is the end of all human life.

Answer 3

No more than getting nuked is the only way Republicans will have all their fears realized.

The problem isn't that Democrats want to talk to those who despise us. We lose nothing by talking. Rather, diplomacy is the only way we can gain in this situation. If you want to gurantee that we lose in Iran, don't discuss their nuclear capability.

And if the US was to be nuked, it would take a Democrat to clean up the mess. Just like the Katrina aftermath (still ongoing) and the Attack of Iraq. A Republican can get us into this mess, but only a Democrat will be able to get us out.

Answer 4

And what would your suggestion be for the middle east. You may think what happens there is of no concern to you but you could not be more wrong.

Has war ever solved anything? Sure it reduces the surplus population but that is fine as long as that surplus is not you right?

If you don't get sides talking you can better believe only war is left. And wouldn't you much rather have the people responsible for those wars talking than you or your sons over there killing other people not responsible for war?

What we have done in this country is take the eye off the ball. Terrorist are our enemy and will be for a long time to come. If you think taking out the enemy of our enemy will make it better you are wrong. Very wrong.

Answer 5

No, they wanted us to go to war and voted for war just like the republicans did.

If America is ever nuked, we will probably take out at least 4 countries. It would be by far the worst thing that ever happened to the world.

Both Republicans and Democrats would be brothers once again.
This country would definitely be a force to deal with because our weapons are supernatural. Whether we want to believe it or not, our freedom is precious to us. Our freedom is worth fighting for and we know how to fight and fight well. We know how to love, we know how to cry, but we are at our best in warfare when there is a cause. We serve the most powerful God and we spread His gospel throughout the world. His name is above every name and He is an omnipotent and omnipresent God.

Answer 6

that's an open ended theoretical question. sure Muslim wackos % nuclear units and could probable use them on the 1st danger they get. the two maximum probably eventualities is to smuggle one in around the border and detonate it in a important city. Or extra probably carry into the harbor of a important coastal city hidden in a deliver and detonate it interior the harbor. making a nuclear gadget is basic in theory yet confusing in engineering. making a sturdy transport equipment like a missile is much tougher. although given time the muslim wackos with help from others like North Korea could have what they'd desire to attack us. And whilst they sense they have a existence like degree of fact that they'd effectively attack us they'll achieve this. they do no longer care if we kill them in retaliation. as long as people die muslim wackos think of they win. Our in basic terms wish is to have an sufficient missile protection equipment for the better tech threats and an exceedingly robust intelligence capablity to objective and end the low tech smuggling efforts. the priority is we would desire to be fortunate and end the assaults a hundred% of the time. The terrorists in basic terms would desire to be fortunate as quickly as to prevail. And detonating a nuclear gadget close to a missile silo could have little result on the size of the burst. it could make the silo inoperable yet maximum silos are very hardened. this is plenty extra probably that assaults will flow after comfortable civilian aims for max result, no longer wasted on distant military aims.

Answer 7

Who are the "terrorists"? If the USA was nuked by an IDENTIFIABLE enemy (not one made up by Dictator Dumbya fuzzy un-intelligence) then by all means respond in kind.

Answer 8

They'd be too busy blaming it on the US and our support of Israel, not to mention the Republicans and esp. Bush to think up a plan...

EDIT: lol wow just read non-compassionate liberal's answer. Typical

Answer 9

Gee I don't know that's as good a question as "If the US were to be attacked in a plan where planes full of people were slammed into buildings full of people and the plan was masterminded by ONE GUY STRAPPED TO A DIALYSIS MACHINE would the Republicans ever kill him?" Wish there was a way for us to ultimately know the answer to these two very good seemingly unanswerable questions.

Answer 10

Why are Republicans making it far more likely that someone would want to nuke the USA?

Answer 11

For sure the Neoconservatins would be flocking to Canada to avoid the Draft