love in vain?
2006-12-23 04:52:45 · 12 answers · asked by Queen of the Wicker People 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Never.....Love is never in vain :)
2006-12-23 04:54:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
My love is not in vain and I do not believe it is possible to love in vain.
True love is unconditional without any expectations what-so-ever. It is the gift that is only given, NOT TAKEN. Therefore it can only appear to be in vain if you are not truly in love and are expecting something in return. Even then the experience of love and giving is enough in itself to render the vanity null & viod. Pride is the #1 sin for a reason. Vanity is also a sin as well as greed. These three feed apon each other in that order. Eliminate them from your life and you will learn true unaduterated love. Replace the word pride with another like confident, sure, happy, elated etc. Being proud means that there is something or someone that you you feel is inferior or incompetant to you. You think that you or someone or even some material object is better than another. This is not so. If you need proof to this, watch some one die.LOVE my friend feels the same to everyone no matter of social standing, material gain or finances. LOVE HURTS the same and it REWARDS the same without prejuduce. Pride is the cause of all wars, ill feelings and regreats. It is also the cause of VANITY. Be rid of it please so you can love freely and be HAPPY.
2006-12-23 06:08:46 · answer #2 · answered by SeaJayDboss 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Love is pure.
2006-12-23 04:56:04 · answer #3 · answered by Rachel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!
I'm married!
2006-12-23 05:11:47 · answer #4 · answered by ~*meli$sa*~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unfortunately yes.
2006-12-23 05:03:53 · answer #5 · answered by Belosnezhka (aka Gex) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
always. Love fades, stick with lust.
2006-12-23 04:54:58 · answer #6 · answered by daddius42 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope not.
2006-12-23 05:03:15 · answer #7 · answered by Professor Sheed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-12-23 04:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by KylieM 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it cannot be
2006-12-24 21:07:13 · answer #9 · answered by vijay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no,not at all.
2006-12-23 04:56:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋