Having watched the interview he gave with Jonathan Ross last night, he said that he was in a coma for two weeks, yet if the papers were believed then he was up and walking about after 48 hours.
2006-12-23 03:47:29 · 14 answers · asked by Bouncer 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
And the papers never exaggerate to sell more copies do they?
2006-12-23 03:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by jamand 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Newspapers always lie only they use phrases like 'an insider said' so that they can distance themselves from their big fat fibs.
I saw Johnathan Ross's show last night. I thought Richard Hammond's interview made for quite uncomfortable viewing. He's obviously still very nervous and a bit uncertain about himself and what happened so I agree with whoever said it was a little ill advised to be putting himself through that level of pressure so soon.
2006-12-23 12:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take notice of what Hamster says - the man is not a liar.
I am speaking from personal experience because, many years ago, my father was unconcious for 60 days after an accident and became a changed man. He could never remember the accident that made him the way he was.
Do not believe all you read in newspapers.
As a former journalist myself, I know how the truth can be twisted.
2006-12-23 12:00:28 · answer #3 · answered by Heugh 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not sure about that. I didnt watch the J Ross show last nite and I don´t remember the newspapers coverage saying he was up and walking after 48hrs! I am sure they said he was "stable" for ages and then after a while that he was walking again (round about the time Jeremy Clarkson visited him),
2006-12-23 11:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by Keira 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He said he couldn't remember what happened during the aftermath because of post traumatic amnesia. It doesn't mean he was in a coma, just that he can't recall those two weeks very well. HTH : )
2006-12-23 20:26:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
having had 3 haemorrhages myself I think he was ill advised to go on TV.he now suffers from short term memory loss give the guy a chance to heal because people don't see scars they think ever thing is OK
he has a long road yet to recovery
2006-12-23 12:11:21 · answer #6 · answered by miss smidgey 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He wasn't up & walking - he was sitting up & TALKING - that's the difference. He said a few words to Jeremy while still in bed.
2006-12-23 12:10:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think that the newspapers may have lied, but it may just be they may have had a wrong sourceof info who knows
2006-12-23 11:58:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would believe the hamster, newspapers dont always tell the truth.
2006-12-23 11:54:36 · answer #9 · answered by grumpcookie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
perhaps he saw re runs of his past performance on TV and that put him to sleep?
2006-12-23 12:19:32 · answer #10 · answered by Peter T 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋