2006-12-23 02:20:09 · 14 answers · asked by adamarsenal 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
ummm...thats a hard question. Adebayor has been surprising this season with the goals he's been scoring but he doesnt finish like he's supposed to. The wigan game proved that. I still believe the duo should be Henry and Van persie. These two up front alone would give some problems to defenders. I say put adebayor in bench and sub him in between Henry or van persie. If he continues with the form he's in now , then he might end up taking van persie place with Henry.
2006-12-23 10:01:17 · answer #1 · answered by ReliableLogic 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adebayor is a respectable replace for Henry, and he has large touch with the ball. yet he would not even come on the ingredient of what Henry or Dennis Bergkamp ever did for Arsenal. i think of Henry is the terrific participant to ever play for the Gunners (perhaps Tony Adams), and Adebayor isn't even the terrific on his group (Fabregas is yet he's injured). i do no longer think of Arsenal desires a clean striker. They have already got Robin van Persie, who does nicely too. Andrei Arshavin will provide extra skills to the attack, so they have 3 good stirkers. additionally, they have been given Nicklas Bendtner and Carlos Vela, 2 youthful youngsters who can score. Emmanuel Adebayor may additionally go away this summer season, so who will fill his footwear (van Persie ought to go away besides). Arshavin could must be a striker, and that may no longer his terrific place.
2016-11-23 13:02:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think henry sholuld be made to fight for his place as his attitude has totally stank since he signed the massive 5 year contract arsenal broke their policy (and the bank) to offer him. we look so predictable in attack in some games he plays it's like watching ian wright's last 2 seasons at arsenal - good goalscorer but the team has no chance if he has a bad day. henry should be rotated with van p and adebayor,and then maybe we'll see his best again
2006-12-26 03:17:14 · answer #3 · answered by Bernee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Adebayor can play mainly up the middle and Henry can drift into the wide areas like he normally does, causing havoc!!
2006-12-23 09:24:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, with Van Persie playing left/right side of midfield, Ljungberg is not shaping, Rosicky doesn't give us any width or much creativity, so I'd rather see Van Persie and Hleb wide with Henry and Adebayor up front
2006-12-25 09:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by Non_Flying_Dutchman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
adebayor is a great player if he played with henry i think no defence can stand infront of them and also van persie can be a substitute for adebayor or henry till he reurns to his preformance
2006-12-23 08:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by Thierry Fekry 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he should stay....arsenal should then off-load henry to a club in spain or italy for 20 million pounds and buy a new centre half and new left back...henry sulks and thinks hes bigger than the team
2006-12-23 11:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by anthony s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya i think he and Henry both should be there. He is a player with greate skill and whenever he is in the team his influence and present can be felt as he wreches through the oppositons defence.I think he should be ther for his abillity,strenght,skill and speed.
2006-12-23 04:02:18 · answer #8 · answered by rahul baid 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-12-23 02:41:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, i think Henry would be best used as a sub. Would like to see more of Wilcox.
2006-12-23 02:46:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋