English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Asking it twice will not attract more answer, you know. It will just cost you 5 additional points.
Read the answer at the first occurrence of your question.

2006-12-23 01:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by Vincent G 7 · 0 0

They have been looking but so far there has not been any. It's difficult to find something that so far has not existed. I'm sure they will find living planets in the future...but until then they cannot just "make up" things, there may not be any in our solar system or in this galaxy...we may have to go beyond our own Galaxy!

2006-12-23 02:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by fade_this_rally 7 · 0 0

i was about to write because there is no life

fact is, that missions featuring experiments searching for life are very complicated and expensive. Additionally they are designed not to mess up a possibly living surface of a planet, making it even more expensive.
As far as i remember there were only both Viking landers on mars featuring experiments with *surprise surprise* positive outcome. Later it was beliefed that those experiments were too unsure to conclude having bacteria up there.
Now who wants to spend money for something uncertain ?

2006-12-23 02:32:20 · answer #3 · answered by blondnirvana 5 · 0 0

Well, one has life for sure - Earth. That leaves only seven or eight where life hasn't been discovered - yet. Add to that the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, there are about a dozen places to look. It early yet, and it's a expensive and time consuming job.

2006-12-23 02:03:38 · answer #4 · answered by DavidNH 6 · 0 0

bcoz there ain't any life out there except on the moon coz its made out of cheese and probably mice are running there

2006-12-23 02:01:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because they don't have the funding....*sigh*

2006-12-23 02:00:10 · answer #6 · answered by guessgizmo 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers