2006-12-23 00:57:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Before asking this question, you should pick up a history book and find out who led the formation of the U.N. and why. Look up, too, the reason its predecessor, the League of Nations, failed. Look at the cost of that failure: over twenty million people murdered in one of the most brutal wars ever to disgrace humankind. Then, if you think you have a better means of preventing such horrors in the future, then by all means, let's hear it. Until then, the one best hope for world peace is the United Nations. Humankind simply cannot afford to allow the UN to fail. YOU cannot afford it, either.
2006-12-23 01:03:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, we basically are the United Nations.
2006-12-23 09:00:22 · answer #2 · answered by lvillejj 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely yes, right away. The United Nations is a total, and complete failure as far as I am concerned. I would much rather have the United States stick with NATO.
2006-12-23 08:59:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
What do you mean get out? We ARE the united nations,.. at least when it actually comes to doing stuff
2006-12-23 09:05:07 · answer #4 · answered by Z 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not get out but certainly get it out of the United States
2006-12-23 09:07:38 · answer #5 · answered by L J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You betcha,the United Nations is good for raping 13 year old girls and not getting involved with the countries that cause problems.But then again what do you expect from an organization that is full of terrorists?
2006-12-23 09:02:10 · answer #6 · answered by halfbright 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes!
2006-12-23 08:58:40 · answer #7 · answered by Nomanz 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes
2006-12-23 09:39:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, UN is useless.
2006-12-23 08:59:39 · answer #9 · answered by Booooo 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would be really smart, would it not?
2006-12-23 09:19:27 · answer #10 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋