It was in the paper and the article was printed for terrorists and gave the details on how and where to set off a dirty bomb that would score the most kills. Why don't New Yorkers run them out of your city? A ballet to sales tax that newspaper $10.00 a copy should work. they are a disgrace to your city and our country.
2006-12-22 22:31:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If you disagree you do not know about thier latest article.
2006-12-22 22:46:40 · update #1
All media sources should be censured when they explore such topics that could provide new ideas to terrorists on how to carry out attacks. Even though the terrorists might already have thought of such things, providing any details on potential weaknesses or planning should be stopped.
If the media wants to explore such ideas and the weaknesses in planning for them, the reports should be released to the people responsible for preventing any attacks and not to the attackers.
2006-12-22 23:01:52 · answer #1 · answered by 63vette 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you're mistaken. People have blown this NYT bashing out of proportion. Nobody complained when NYT was major supporter of WMD evidence just before Iraq War. Things NYT have published were nothing in 'particularly' helpful to terrorists and not helpful to them at all. Other papers run same stories NYT publishes. All this media bashing is out of control people complaining every line they don't like in any print media. Everybody now go around bashing FOX, CNN, or whatever. It's nuts. If the US can conjure up WMD that didn't exist they ain't gona miss chance to prosecute someone for treason. Or is the US gov real stupid? I don't think so.
Bottom line is there is difference between embarrasing Bush administration and aiding terrorist which is crime and is always prosecuted at slightest suspicion. Either Bush administration is extremely stupid not being able to prosecute obvious treason against NYT or they're just mad that NYT stories are embarrasing them. So which is it?
They were able to prosecute WMD case without real WMD but can't prosecute NYT for treason? Weak.
Accusation of lack of patriotism and false treason is the lowest form of criticism one can make and is intended to intimidate people who ask questions and criticize government.
2006-12-22 22:42:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolute rubbish..the idea that the NY times printed an article for terrorist....is right wing paranoia thinking..and they are disgrace to our country along with the Bush administration !
2006-12-22 22:44:16 · answer #3 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The New York Times hates America, plain and simple. The writers and editors alike should be tried for treason.
2006-12-22 22:36:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The writer, editor, and owner of the communist (NY) times should be hung for treason.
2006-12-22 23:18:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a lie.
NY Times is THE BEST!!!
2006-12-22 22:45:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋