BushCo and the NEOCONS want Dominion over the whole region, and having bases or surrogates from Cairo through Saudi Arabia to Bagdad is part of the plan. An independant Iran is a thorn in their saddle, exposing their right flank, and they don't like it.
2006-12-22 21:01:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow, lunacy and an intelligent topic in the same breath. Got the whole spectrum with this one. Do you know who found the oil in the Middle East? it was Texaco. American owned, last I checked. We gave it to the Arabs to maintain their sovreignty. Don't you think if this whole thing was about oil, that we'd have some of it by now? That maybe we'd be a little more careful that insurgents don't blow up the refineries? 80% of Iraq's money comes from that oil. How could we afford to pay for running the country if we were taking the oil? Rant done. This build-up, if it is real, is obviously to pressure Iran into knocking off its nuclear program. Because whether you like Israel or not, they will be Iran's first target. Israel has nukes of their own. Bad juju if Iran and Israel have nukes.
2006-12-22 19:48:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
OPEC controls the oil not the US. Never has never will. You keep asking the same question about the US controlling Iraq's oil. I guess you are (hint, hint) the only one who can answer that one to your satisfaction. As far as Iran, many countries are are putting pressure on Iran. Except Russia, Russia is stalling all talks until they can sell off as much military arms as they can. Then they will jump on the wagon with the rest of the world. Does anyone really think Iran won't start trouble once they get nukes.
2006-12-22 22:34:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by jessica a 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
OPEC controls the oil no longer the U. S.. in no way has in no way will. you maintain asking the comparable question with reference to the U. S. controlling Iraq's oil. i assume you're (hint, hint) the only one that could answer that one on your delight. so a great way as Iran, many countries are are putting rigidity on Iran. different than Russia, Russia is stalling all talks till they'd unload as lots militia palms as they'd. Then they are going to bounce on the wagon with something of the international. Does absolutely everyone somewhat think of Iran won't start up subject as quickly as they get nukes.
2016-10-18 21:56:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by shade 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is about trying to pressure iran to stop it's nuclear activites on its nuclear power stations. This is truly a worthwhile interest in my book, much more important than oil.
2006-12-22 19:38:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really resent you referring to Americans as nazi's seeing that a whole lot of brave Americans died defeating that sick cult you seem to admire so much. You us US Army as a name but I'd be willing to bet you never served, except maybe hamburgers through a drive-up window. The deal now is to prevent Iran for developing nuclear weapoms because they will use them if they have them.
2006-12-22 20:37:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Approximately 69 million Iranians out of a world population of 6.5 BILLION non-Iranians might agree with your somewhat infantile assessment.
2006-12-22 21:15:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think you know what a NAZI is but I'll give you a hint.they're not American ! Never use Terminology you don't understand
because your debate becomes pointless like the Question you asked!
2006-12-22 19:37:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by dadacoolone 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Don't worry Bush has all of us wrapped so tight around the middle east oil no one can get to them.
2006-12-22 20:03:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Y 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oil, Bush's ego, and supporting Isreal's adgenda
2006-12-22 19:55:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
1⤊
1⤋