Is not having a fore skin bad?

Question

I heard that it helps a guy not premature ejaculate i believe in not having sex before marriage so it is no use to me in preventing STD's

Answer 1

It really makes no difference one way or the other, in either situation. It is a little easier to keep things clean if you've been circumsized, which is why they do it to most baby boys now.

Answer 2

Actually the head (glans) of the penis is usually more sensitive with a foreskin and hence premature ejaculation occurs more often than with the exposed glans of the circumcised penis. Either, however, may have premature ejaculation which is partly a psychological problem.

There are other pros for circumcision. An important one is simplified hygiene, only one shower a day and washing the penis in the same way that all external parts of the body are. If in marriage, you plan to practice oral sex, the American woman usually prefers the clean look that comes with circumcision. But the uncut penis can certainly be kept clean by washing with mild soap and warm water at least 2 and often 3 times a day, and certainly before having sexual relations.

Those who are circumcised as adults report, however, that sex is
now a whole penis sensation: the nerves ending in the foreskin are now activated in the shaft, the glans is just as sensitive, and an intact frenulum carries with it a focus of sensitivity.

So consider having yourself circumcised. You will not regret it. The foreskin is overrated in terms of sensitivity. And if the glans is not kept really cleaned, then the danger of irritation and infection, as well as smell, will crop up.

It is your decision to make.

Answer 3

Congratulations on your decision to remain chaste. You will not regret it.

Foreskin is very beneficial, both for husband and wife. It is rich in nerve endings which add to the pleasures of the marriage bed. Equally important, it protects the head (glans) of the penis from being desensitized from rubbing on clothing. Cut penises are sometimes so dulled that the man has to mastrubate after intercourse, which makes his wife feel inadequate. Sex is better for your wife if you keep your foreskin, as the glans remains soft, moist, and comfortable for her instead of rough and harsh.

Men have foreskins for a reason. The glans is actually considered an internal organ! Chopping it off goes against reason. I am sure you are not too lazy to wash, so the "hygiene" arguments against keeping the penis as nature intended will not apply. There is no reason an uncut man cannot stay clean! And cancer of the penis is so rare that more men/boys die from complications of circumcision each year than from that cancer!

Please keep your foreskin, for your own sake and for the sake of the woman you will marry!

Answer 4

firstly, foreskin does not prevent STD's. I don't know where you heard that from. Secondly, it only helps prevent premature ejaculation because the area there is less sensitive as there is no foreskin protecting it and it rubs more on your jocks etc.

I'm sure if we weren't supposed to have foreskin, somewhere along the course of evolution, nature would of got rid of it for you. It's there for a reason.

Answer 5

Not at all.

I know the trend is to leave boys intact now, but there is one risk that is totally eliminated when circumcised...penile cancer.

And if you're concerned about appearance...erect, the cut penis looks no different from the uncut.

Answer 6

Circumcision has it's advantages. "Premature ejaculation" is a myth invented by liberal airhead sexologists.

I commend your philosophy, and I practice it, as well.

Answer 7

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2006121301155