was it necessary to give nobel peace prize to yusuf of Bangladesh?

Answer 1

First of all, it is Dr. Yunus and not 'yusuf' as mentioned by you who got Nobel peace prize - 2006.

I think you can at least go for a Ph. D. in finding out how inappropriately this year's Nobel Prizes were doled out. And for that matter start form 2006 and go back to the time when it started giving out Nobel peace prize out of 'necessity'.

By the way, we are proud of Rabindra Nath Thakur and Amritya Sen, the other two recipient of Nobel Prize among Bengali speaking people, though they belong to India. So, was your question slanted heavily for the matter of Bangladeshi getting a Nobel Prize? If so, then you may be doubting intelligence of Nobel Prize awarding committee about their judgement.

Take a deep breath, please!

Answer 2

Actually the prize was given by the world community in stunned realization that there still are a few on the subcontinent that can care enough to go the extra mile to uplift the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of our teeming shores

(modified from The New Colossus - Emma Lazarus, 1883)

Answer 3

It's never *necessary* to give a Nobel prize to any particular individual, last I checked. Receiving a Noble is not exactly a constitutional right.

Answer 4

This sounds like you're upset with the fact that a Bangladeshie won this prize. Yusuf has done a wonderful thing for his poor country and has made it possible for those living in poverty to successfully undertake a business venture. Don't be upset with him for that.

Answer 5

Nobel prize is given for a person's achievement irrespective of nationality!!

Answer 6

You will get more relevant and good answers, if you provide your views and opinion for his selection of nobel award.

Answer 7

Because he is a peace maker of bangladesh.