How is philosophy related to justice?

Answer 1

The same way God is related to religion.

There is often no connection at all other than lip service.

Answer 2

Well philosophy is how we get our laws, we go by philosophy.
We analyze those philosophies based on fairness and wisdom, and try to balance like the scales. It is not perfect but for the most part it could be when we become more analytical about our decisions. We could be a far more civilized society if we understood the teachings of the worlds leader in philosophy.
Arthur Schoepenhauer "World as Will and Representation"
Any good teacher will tell you to read that book and learn the balance of mankind and his environment, and his decisions.
A quote from Schoepenhauer that I love is "Man will or won't, not can or can't." And that is true, can or can't is an excuse, but taking responibility and stepping up to the plate and making a swing at it with decisiveness is for the most part very hard for the majority of people. Most get frustrated, angry, vile, and cruel, they dont care about balance, so they make up a philosophy like "an eye for an eye". Well wonder if someone took your leg off in a car accident? Would it be appropriate to take their leg off? No way it was an accident, so that would not be justice. But a majority of the people would actually take the other guys leg off, or have it done for them. That is called vengence. In philosophy of Justice we seek a balance not vengence, a blind form of weighing those scales, and unless it is a philosophy that matches the unbiased opinion there is no justice, therefore the philosophy that they are using is the eye for an eye routine and that is not justice. Nor is it a philosophy it is called Revenge.

Answer 3

Philosophy in regards to justice is handed down through religion in my view. I am an atheist but I have a very stern view of morality. You don't cheat on your girlfriend/wife/lover. You don't murder other humans, treat others as you would like to be treated, etc.

These are basic morality lessons passed through most organized religions for a reason. They are the basis or bedrock for a society that can work. How can I feel safe in my house if don't know if my neighbor or tribal member has the same view?

You need to have a basis for justice so that there are parameters allowing society to prosper. No matter what someone believes, there must be ramifications for actions that are a detriment to society or the tribe as a whole.

God, Alah, etc. provide a philosophy for humanity to follow rules that allow for a society or community to exist. This is also the basis of war unfortunately. Those that have different rules are enemies. So the philosophies that keep me and you together are the same that give us reason to band together and kill those that have different views that us.

Catch 22 anyone?

Answer 4

A couple of ways. Justice is clearly one of the topics discussed in philosophy departments of universities. We learn some definitions, discuss some of the ways they are good or bad, perhaps even examine some rules of justice if ones specialty is ethics. (Mine was.)

The other way is that a great many people consider philosophy the most appropriate pre-law major, and so most lawyers have had at least a few philosophy courses. They learn logic, at least, and some of the other techniques of reason and analysis that are so important later when they are preparing cases.

And of course, virtually all judges are lawyers first.

Answer 5

The search for Justice can be a philosophy.

Answer 6

A more efficient question would be, "How is philosophy not related to justice?" The very concept of justice is a philosophical one, because justice does not exist as such in the natural world. It is a metaphysical idea, and therefore relies on philosophy for its very existence.
In essence, justice stems from a root belief in a system of right and wrong, and such systems cannot be derived from the material world. They come from spiritual ideas: laws laid down by the gods, or by God. As time went on, concepts of right and wrong changed into a more humanistic aproach, where they were taylored, not to any particular deity, but to understanding of human nature, and what constituted its inherent rights. However, both the original idea of justice and the contemporary one rely on the belief that an act can be metaphysically right or wrong, and therefore is contingent on a philosophical explanation of metaphysics to discover the laws of right and wrong.

Answer 7

Philosophy concerning to regulation is termed JURISPRUDENCE. that is a study dedicated to regulation and regulation on my own. Questions like: might want to we contain morality in regulation to justify regulations that are made(organic regulation). Or, regulations exceeded should be for the coolest of the most kind of human beings with out having regard to that's "goodness" or 'badness'(utilitarianism). Is justice an important requirement in regulation? ought to we nonetheless save on with regulations that are patently for instance that violates human rights no matter if it replaced into enacted to create orders in a rustic?? those are some procedures that philosophy can relate to regulation and finally, justice.

Answer 8

In endless ways from a million angles. What if one were to believe that there is natural justice and that fate was out of our control. So if one were destinated to end up where they must then there would be no guilty becouse they had no choice in their destiney. Natural justice it self would be the balance for equal and opposite reactions occurring in world. Thous justice a naturally occuring balance that is going to occur without our help.

Answer 9

The concept of justice is based on a presumption of social morals and ethic and these also require logical arguments and that in itself is philosophical!

Answer 10

we all have a view of fairness in the balance of learning for community living which often extends beyond local boundaries even when it is not equally known universally it is often misunderstood when it is used most to benefit those who know the original agreements for just balance in correcting thought and action to be true as in one. the lessons are not equally shared, they are sold for leverages which often cause an off balance and civil arguments to break out like a plague.A.M.H.