2006-12-22 17:03:00 · 21 answers · asked by Luis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
whoa somebody didnt like my question eh haha
2006-12-22 17:32:08 · update #1
Because the liberal's will to fight has been drained. They want freedom but dont recognize the number one threat to that freedom, and thats terrorism. They deny the threat of radical islam, and instead turn their 'guns' on our own government simply because of the (R) in front of it
2006-12-22 17:22:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
We go after are own interests like always laziness and $$$. Here in Canada WE spend millions every year on publicity's to help people stop smoking. But they don't really want us to stop...If they would we would get prescriptions for cigarettes. And the 18+ would have to apply for the right to smoke legally.I think the real answer is a lack of respect for life and the right for all to be free,including all animals...But no what will we eat, i'll lose my job at the factory, if i don't cook the lobsters alive they wont be fresh...!!!! on and on and on.
We have to stop thinking are freedom is worth more than others freedoms.
EGO EGO EGO EGO EGO EGO EGO....
Respect life, i'll respect you and it will respect you back.
Oh by the way here in Canada the liberals are the best of the parties when respect is concerned...the PCs are the worst by far.They have new idea's every week and bad ones at that. Even to the point of amazement. Like they want to ban driving under the influence of all drugs but we don't yet have the technologies to do this(Only for alcool) and they never conducted a study to identify the real symptoms of drugs. So we would have to take in considerable cost to deternine if your just tired or under the influence by going to the hospital to get tested there. Can you imagine the costs to are struggling healthcare system. Amazed!
2006-12-22 18:03:01 · answer #2 · answered by bluesmozis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many liberals and conservatives are cont4ent to let the other man do his fighting. Clinton didnt serve in Nam, neither did DIck Cheney or Bush, you see a lot of those on here who should enlist spewing their hatered one way or another while safe at home. I served in Nam an unpopular war, but it was my duty and honor to do so, even though after having been there I felt we made a mistake in being there and once there not invading North Viet Nam, but onedoes have a moral obligation to provide service to his country in my opinion.
2006-12-22 20:18:41 · answer #3 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We're willing to fight, but not in a war designed to make the rich richer, and kill off a bunch of poor people. The war is illegal on an International level. We were not attacked by Iraq, it was an inside job. Larry A. Silverstein, lease holder of the trade tower complex got 7 Billion dollars, after taking out "terrorist" insurance only 6 weeks before the so called "attack". The towers were full of asbestos, needed to be brought up to code, had major problems with electrical and internet connections, and were loosing Silverstein money. It would have cost a fortune to bring up to code. So he had it brought down, including building 7, which was never hit by a plane. He was heard to say, on tv, thet they made the decission to "Pull building seven", which means destroy it. Bush got the war he wanted so badly(Remember, he stated he was "the war president"), Rumsfeld got his "New Pearl Harbor", and Silverstein got rid of his white elephant, and made a fortune killing American citizens. Only cost him 4500 lives to get 7 Billion dollars. Lucky man. Time for you to wake up, and realise you got a piece of meat stuck somewhere by the government!.
2006-12-22 17:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by Darqblade 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hmm, I don't know. I'll have to ask my liberal dad, who is a Vietnam vet. And I guess that Bronze Star my staunchly left-wing grandfather earned in WWII must have come from a cereal box.
You might want to contact your proctologist right away. He or she may be able to extract your head.
2006-12-23 06:44:41 · answer #5 · answered by redhed311 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a liberal but I'm doing it right now by protesting and fighting the slow curtailing of liberties at home.
Our freedom isn't being threatened in Iraq. It is right here in this country.
Who started the American Revolution and fought it- Liberals.
What were the conservatives doing? Pleading with the rebels to "talk" with the British Empire.
Read your history. Liberals built this country.
2006-12-22 17:13:47 · answer #6 · answered by GG Alan Alda 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
every one is to libral nowadays . when it come to our curent war fight the islama faciest like we did the nazi kill em all let god sort em out. pluss libralls are contrairy to sosiety and the 1st and second amendment. they where not raised right. peace and love dont solve nothing they denigh the fact people by nature have hate in there hearts and they have great big man-ginas and watch lifetime. it starts with thease 60s profesers and meda all that. michle more can go to sanfransisco and get sodomized. and librals are stupid people who are not awair of there stupidity.
2006-12-22 17:38:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
because they are all brainwashed. They can't help it. I am a United States Marine, me and my fellow brothers and sisters will continue to fight. Not just for the ones who understand, but especially for the ones who do not. Maybe they will understand someday. Let them keep talking and we will keep fighting for their freedom to talk.
2006-12-22 18:18:22 · answer #8 · answered by semperfi 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because our freedom might offend someone, and any good liberal knows that others not being offended surrendering are more important than our freedom. Yeah it is not worth ticking off the people who hate us to preserve our Country and beliefs.
2006-12-22 17:14:31 · answer #9 · answered by thegorilla55 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because they like to lie back and let others do the work for them. It doesn't really if it is in the workplace or the honor of this country .
Liberals are generally lazy cowards in my most humble opinion.
2006-12-22 17:22:08 · answer #10 · answered by caciansf 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
perhaps it's because we're consistent when we say we want peace. War is not Peace. It does not bring about peace. Humanitarian work brings about peace, like the Marshall plan after WWII- contrast that to the End of WWI- did the peace after WWI last?
Right. If you are actually in favor of peace and freedom, you encourage it in ways that will make it lasting.
2006-12-22 17:13:02 · answer #11 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋