1) Twelve 12 American astronauts have walked on the moon.
Apollo 11: Neil Armstrong & Buzz Aldrin
Apollo 12: Pete Conrad & Alan Bean
Apollo 13: << failed to land on the moon >>
Apollo 14: Alan Shepard & Edgar (Ed) Mitchell
Apollo 15: David Scott & James Irwin
Apollo 16: John Young & Charles Duke
Apollo 17: Eugene (Gene) Cernan & Harrison Schmidt
2) Why haven't we been back?
a) American astronauts visited the moon on six occasions.
b) The "moon race" was an extension of the cold war. It was mostly about national prestige. We got there first and achieved our primary objective. There was some good science: surveys, measurements, sample collection. But it was mostly about being there first. Once we achieved our primary objective, there was no political will to go back. There still isn't. Perhaps, if we discover He3 or something else valuable, there will be.
c) I used to travel to Crested Butte, Colorado every year to ski. Because I don't go anymore, does it mean that I never went?
3) What about the Van Allen radiation belts? Wouldn't it have killed the astronauts?
The existence of the Van Allen radiation belts postulated in the 1940s by Nicholas Christofilos. Their existence was confirmed in *1958* by the Explorer I satellite launched by the USA.
The radiation in the Van Allen radiation belts is not particularly strong. You would have to hang out there for a week or so in order to get radiation sickness. And, because the radiation is not particularly strong, a few millimeters of metal is all that is required for protection. "An object satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminum will receive about 2500 rem (25 Sv) per *year*."
"In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation." When the astronauts returned to Earth, their dosimeters showed that they had received about as much radiation as a couple of medical X-rays.
4) The U.S. government scammed everyone?
In 1972, there was a politically motivated burglary of a hotel room in the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D.C. There were only about six or eight people who knew about it. However, those people, including Richard M. Nixon, the President of the United States, failed to keep that burglary a secret. It exploded into a scandal that drove the President and a number of others from office.
If six or eight people couldn't keep a hotel room burglary a secret, then how could literally thousands of people could have kept their mouths shut about six faked moon landings? Not just one moon landing, but six of them!
5) What about the USSR?
Even if NASA and other government agencies could have faked the six moon landings well enough to fool the general public, they could NOT have fooled the space agency or military intelligence types in the USSR. The Soviets were just dying to beat us. If the landings were faked, the Soviets would have re-engineered their N-1 booster and landed on the moon just to prove what liars Americans are. Why didn't they? Because the landings were real and the Soviets knew it.
6) Why does the flag shake? Where are the stars? Who took the video of Neil Armstrong?
Take a look at the first two websites listed below. They deal well with all of the technical questions.
7) Finally, please tell us what you would accept as definitive evidence that the six moon landings were real. Is there anything?
2006-12-22 17:26:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Otis F 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Mary, get this straight and don't be foolish about it any more, okay? The basic technology required for a manned flight to the moon was developed in Germany in the late 1930s through the mid 1940s. This technology needed a lot of refinement to make a safe manned flight a reality.
We worked on that technology through the 1950s and 60s, and made the first manned moon flight in 1969. It all fits together, and if you read all the history and don't let the wackos lie to you, it will be impossible for you to continue to be fooled into believing that the moon missions did not take place.
The American people were much better educated and more intelligent in the 1960s and 70s than they are now, and it would never have occurred to NASA engineers and managers that 35 years later a bunch of ignorant dolts with nothing to do would come up with a stupid conspiracy theory stating that the moon landings were faked.
If that had occurred to them, I suspect the engineers would have gone to the trouble to create a larger and more visible object of proof, to compensate for the decline in the quality of the American mind and its education that occurred during and after the Reagan presidency.
But there is a real physical proof available. The astronauts who landed on the moon left behind reflectors that are used every day by astronomers to measure the irregularities of the moon's orbit. This is done by bouncing laser beams off reflectors at known locations that were left by the astronauts. Ask your science teacher for information about these experiments. You can arrange to see this done with your own eyes.
Let me put the question to you this way: If you think the moon landings were faked, when did they become "fake?" When did the idea become popular that NASA had invented the idea of an imaginary moon mission and created a huge technological empire to fool people? When was all this fakery done? In the 60s? 70s? 80s?
And why? What was the point? And how did they fool all the people that reported the news, operated the machinery, built the moon rockets, and watched them take off and land?
Do you realize that one American in 500 was a part of the Apollo program? Millions of them are still alive. Are they fooling you? Why? If you go out to a football game, look around you. In the stadium there are people who worked on the Apollo program.
Ask around. You are surrounded by people who know for sure that American astronauts stood on the moon more than 35 years ago.
2006-12-22 16:05:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by aviophage 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes. We landed on the moon. Period. Your chemistry teacher is sadly wrong. It's not radiation around the moon but around the earth that they would need to be worried about...called the Van Allen Belts...
yes, they are dangerous, but they can be protected against for a short time.
The double shadows of the flag? That's a new one. Perhaps your chemistry teacher should take a lesson in photography.
2006-12-22 15:54:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by star2_watch 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes of course we landed on the moon silly! Thats why there was all kinds of TV stations showing Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin land on the Moon.
2006-12-22 18:58:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by karatechamp2007 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Looking at the level of competence of our country now, it seems hard to believe we could have made to the moon. But although the technology of today would have made it far easier to fake a moon landing than to actually do it, the technology of the 1960's was far, far less sophisticated. Then, it was easier to go to the moon than fake it. We didn't even have Pong yet, FCOL.
2006-12-22 18:17:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lorenzo Steed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
aviophage that is one of the most rediculas answers i have ever heard , if we were better educated in the 1950's - 1960's than how come we now have better and faster computers and how come pluto has been proven to not be a planet and if one in 500 hundred people worked on the appolo mission they would have had to sign a contract of secracy for anything that was done that the public doesn't need to know. plus why did the flag wave on the moon there is no wind to make it move it's SPACE!
2006-12-22 18:56:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well the u.s. has landed on the moon multiple times but theres a conspericy that the first moon landing was shot on a set at area 51 so the u.s. could win could win the space race
2006-12-22 18:40:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by matt 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aviophage...That was the most awesome response to this stupid recurring question that I have ever read. Thank you for posting it. Thank you.
If someone's chemistry teacher is teaching you this kind of thing, this person may be teaching you other "scientific facts" that are not true. You might want to bring this to the attention of the higher ups in your school. This type of conspiracy theory ignorance is poor teaching technique and plain irresponsible.
The best way to defeat this sort of thing is to ask someone. Looking it up yourself is good too, because when you search for the answers on your own you are more likely to remember them, and to form your own thoughts and opinions.
2006-12-22 16:25:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by ~XenoFluX 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
we have... why if we have already been there would we waste our time going back when we could be exploring other planets and things?? They have recordings of Neil Armstrong on the moon. I think it was real. Plus why would people even want to make up a hoax about that... what's the point?
It was real. Not a hoax.
2006-12-22 15:50:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I wasn't there, so I can't say with 100% accuracy. But, if we can launch a space shuttle into orbit (verifiable by anyone in Florida), why couldn't we put someone on the moon?
2006-12-22 15:52:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by brian_with_an_i 2
·
1⤊
0⤋