2006-12-22 14:38:36 · 12 answers · asked by areyoukidding 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
This is really simple. How many can simply answer the question w/o all the crap.
2006-12-22 14:40:40 · update #1
I had a bet going that no one would simply answer the question as requested. Thanks all. I won 500 bucks.
2006-12-22 14:46:35 · update #2
You've definitely got a point. No men means no more wars.
Of course the remaining women might go to war if a single man turned up alive.
And of course the reason there will be no more wars after all the men are gone is that there will also be no more people once those already born have all died off...
2006-12-22 14:44:15 · answer #1 · answered by greg.gourdian 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I gotta go with Cordova on this one, I worked in an office run and mostly staffed by women and you wouldn't believe how disorganized it was. People spent more time gossipping and trying to pull rank to get out of work than actually working.
How many female world leaders actually stood out and did something spectacular during her time in office?
(Hint:Thatcher wasn't one of them)
Granted, most men aren't excellent leaders either but blaming their gender is as intelligent as blaming their skin color or hairstyle.
2006-12-22 22:43:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is human nature to want something that belongs to someone else if you do not have it yourself.
If the world was to revert to the utopia that feminists project; there would still be warm disease, and famine; because the strong will take from the weak.
2006-12-22 22:44:25 · answer #3 · answered by Rev. Two Bears 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course there wouldn't be. If there weren't any men, then women wouldn't be able to reproduce, so in a very short time the human race would die off completely.
2006-12-22 22:41:48 · answer #4 · answered by BAnne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but only 3-5 days a month. Blood shed would be superficial at best and casualties only in extreme circumstances.
2006-12-22 22:57:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No men, no more people and thus no more war or a ton of other human things as the entire humanity would be wiped clean and die off.
2006-12-22 22:41:25 · answer #6 · answered by Help 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Like in that movie, The Last Man on Earth? You're right. That movie sucked.
2006-12-22 22:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by celebduath 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if you mean man as in no mankind-true
if you mean no males-false-women fight wars too-but usually in the beauty salon but it would go country to country too-James 1 from wence cometh wars-from the lusts within desiring to have what others have ...
2006-12-23 09:35:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
At work the men are the peaceful ones. It is those women you gotta watch, treacherous.
2006-12-22 22:40:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
you mean you have never met a mean vengeful bitchy woman.
war would be likely to happen each and every month.
2006-12-22 22:42:12 · answer #10 · answered by dirtyoldman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋