Then we could nuke all three countries and kill a lot of assholes.
2006-12-22 13:23:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by DB Cash 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably divide Iraq into two countries. Shiites to the south, Sunni to the north (or the other way around if I've got that backwards). Either way, Iran would probably be a better custodian of Iraq than the US. With Bush and Haliburton trucking oil as fast as they can, a few civil liberties are being ignored.
Don't let the news fool you, the US troops are indeed working with Iraqi soldiers to take eventually take over their own country, but Maliki's not stupid, he realizes he's got a free paycheck in letting the Americans run his country.
2006-12-22 20:08:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hotwad 980 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A peace would last for a few years. This is provided what action the USA takes too. Since US dollars depend on this region something would likely unite them all against us.
Now if USA interests are able to make a deal with these guys for oil, I am sure we can all be friends.
2006-12-22 20:03:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by dkminion 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iran would visit Tues and Thurs, and Syria insists on visiting on Sundays
2006-12-22 20:22:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the united states would slap the back of their hands and put soap in their mouths. bad country! bad!
2006-12-22 20:03:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by ConstElation 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe WWIII
2006-12-22 20:01:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by undercovernudist 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
All heck will break lose!
2006-12-22 20:02:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
order would be restored swiftly.
2006-12-22 20:33:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
WW3
2006-12-22 20:21:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋