When Iran acquires nukes, who will they attack first? Israel, Europe or America?

Question

Here's a great article about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran. Please brows it if you get the time. It spells out his intentions quite clearly.

Here's a great article about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran. Please browse it if you get the time. It spells out his intentions quite clearly.

Answer 1

Iran is a terrorist state that has proclaimed that it wishes to destroy Israel. Nuclear weapons would give them the opportunity to do so, heaven forfend.

If Israel does indeed have a nuclear capability, it will use it only as a last resort, after a first strike by some other power.

Iran is the biggest threat to the West today, and their military capability must be curbed by the West.

In addition, individual terrorists must be eliminated--if necessary by engaging them and killing them.

There can be no rational argument against this two-pronged approach.

Answer 2

They will attack No one first. First of all they are ten years away from developing a Nuke. well. More than a dirty bomb. If they tried to bomb somewhere it would be close. ICBM technologies are still a few years away. So it would have to be Israel But. The like the Palestinians and Nuking Israel dooms Palestine. Were talking nuking a little country surrounded by friends, A real little country.
This big >> !......! With a bomb that would blow up an area this big !..........................!
Now Iran is Not full of idiots. If it were they would not be wanting nuclear power. You have to understand that it takes science to build a nuclear power plant.
So, They do the math. Bombing Europe would take seventeen ICBMs (inter-continental Ballistic Missiles) But Europe has over three hundred ready to rip at any time.
Lets use our measuring dots again.
!................! << IRAN
!..................................................................................! Now how many ICBMs does it take to make Iran a sheet of glass? The answer is "1"
They would not attack with any nuke that would result in destruction of their entire civilization.
Again we use the measuring dots
!................! << IRAN
!...................................................................................................................................................................................!
< America and Canada you nuke one they both nuke you.
Scientific fact. one of our ICBMs will make Iran a Molten pit they hold lots of scatterable warheads
Summation
If Iran nuked anyone. No matter who it was. within a few minutes there would be no Iran. If Iran were nuked by anyone in a first strike scenario. Who ever used the nuke on them would be toast.
If old GW Bush were to even want to Nuke another country in a first strike scenario. We the People would strap his happy *** to a warhead. Because we know one goes out and hundreds return.

Answer 3

Wow.......interesting question....."when Iran aquires nukes"

Personally, I believe that in the possibility of Iran aquiring a nuclear weapon they would not use it at all. Just think of it this way. You are a small, poor country that is feeling extremely threatened by this huge world superpower called the USA. They have thousands of nukes, and could blow up your entire country, the entire middle east if they wanted to. You have a pathetic military when compared to them. You only aquired this nuke because you wanted it for a small confidence boost and for extreme cases of self defense where the existance of your country depends upon it.

Iran would not nuke anyone because they know that USA would wipe them off the face of the earth if they do. If you put yourself in their shoes, you would see that nobody would be insane enough to attack any of these countries with a nuke.

Answer 4

They can't reach the US with the missiles they've got right now however, they can reach Europe and Israel right now. But they won't use any of their nukes because they know the US would wipe Iran off the face of the earth and Iran couldn't even retaliate. Plus Israel has it's own nuke weapons including subs positioned in the Persian Gulf with Nuke missiles that could reach Tehran in 5 minutes.

Answer 5

i think of the undertaking with Chirac's comments is that it does not nicely known the opportunity of rogue forces finding out to purchase administration of all or area of an Iranian nuclear missile facility. in spite of the shown fact that it quite is actual that there's no longer a unmarried united states of america in the international at present that could launch a nuke with no reaction via another united states of america. Even the U. S. is saved in verify via Russia and China. and there is no longer something that should end the Iranians from construction a bomb with the comparable enriched Uranium that they declare is mandatory to fulfill their potential demands. a rustic, which happens to be sitting on between the biggest oil reserves interior the international. I for one as a liberal agree that different international locations attempt to make potential strikes interior the attempt to receive wealth and relevancy interior the international economic gadget. Bush's concept that we ought to take care of ourselves from foreign places aggressors isn't thoroughly off the mark. I basically disagree with the assumption of utilising infantrymen to do it. we've finished air and water superiority international. we ought to consistently use those forces to maintain others in verify. no longer our infantrymen. And as far through fact the missile protection gadget is going, the Russians have the the suitable option to be paranoid. Any "missile protection" gadget is one that is able to launching missiles at possibly different missiles yet can relatively pass on offense and be released at different aims pre-emptively. So who is going to have faith this may be a "protection" gadget? Given our modern aggression, no person.

Answer 6

I do not believe that this schmuck who runs Iran is stupid enough to use a nuke to bomb anyone. If he does, Iran disappears in a cloud of ashes and smoke. Israel, USA, France, England, etc. can hit Iran and blow it off the face of the earth.

Answer 7

We're not gonna nuke any country, what is that nonsense you keep talking about? We don't even have nuclear weapons. Just nuclear ENERGY, is it so hard to distinguish between these two??
We are Muslims and Islam forbids us to use weapons of mass destruction, it means even if we had and wanted to use them we wouldn't have been to do so.

Answer 8

Israel

Answer 9

imo the only nation threatning nuclear strike in a real way is the US .. anyone with more than 2 or 3 braincells firing in iran could figure out that their country would be a smoldering glass pit if they did that ... no ... iran wants nukes so the US wont attack them.

Answer 10

They'll lob one over into Tel Aviv. America will thus have to get involved, while the cowards known as EUROPE (especially the now Muslim nation of France!) hurl insults at the USA and (as always) do nothing.