English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

There is a God and we have scientific proof and if people use it, common sense. Lets take the evolution for example. If we really did evovle from apes then why is it that when we (women) have babies, why are they not baby apes?
But the biggest one is prophecy. In the Bible, God forsaw Jesus' birth 100 years before he was born. Wondering why Frankensense, Mur, and Gold at his birth? Think about the song.

"Born a baby on Bethlehem's plain
Gold we bring to crown Him again
King forever, ceasing never
Over us all to rein"

Gold represents Jesus growing up to be a king (prophesied and fufilled)

"Frankincense to offer have I
Incense owns a Deity nigh
Pray'r and praising, all men raising
Worship Him, God most high"

Frankincense represents Him being a High Presits (prophised and fufilled

"Myrrh is mine, its bitter perfume
Breathes of life of gathering gloom
Sorrowing, sighing, bleeding, dying
Sealed in the stone-cold tomb"

Myrrh represents Jesus' death. (prophesied and fufilled)

All these things were prophesied at His birth and were fufilled along the way.

The Bible is our manual of life. If you read it, it relates to what we go through today.

So we have Prophecy, Common Sense, and Proof that God exists.

And of course there are no other gods. There is only one God. All those others do nothing. Did Abba or whoever bring fire to the sacrifice in Exodus? No. God did.

Did Moses get his power from Budda to bring all the plagues? No. Budda doesn't exists. Budda is air. Nothing. God is almighty.

2006-12-22 10:51:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

This is hardly a question worth asking, since it has no determinable answer. Saying outright that there's no chance for a god of any kind is almost as ridiculous as saying the Christian god is the only true supreme power. The evidence has certainly stacked up against Christianity over the past 1000 years though - that's for sure. If there's a god, it seems likely to me it acts as a force with no personifiable qualities. It doesn't "watch us" or "answer prayers" - something simply happened which created all matter and caused the big bang, and this can be referred to as god.

Or maybe the universe is just an extremely advanced computer simulation from a far more advanced society than ours.

In response to ((natles||*: We did not evolve from apes. Apes and humans share a common ancestor. The difference you see today between humans and apes has taken millions and millions of years to develop. Study evolution before you comment on it. Your other comment is so ridiculous I don't know where to start, so I'll simply say you have a lot to learn about religion, and you need to start questioning the things Daddy and Church tell you.

2006-12-22 19:09:43 · answer #2 · answered by calc_crushinator 1 · 0 0

First, define what you mean by God.

If you mean The supreme Being of the Universe, then, if there is one, there can only be one (otherwise, which one is the "supremest"?)

If you mean an entity with power so great that, compared to what we understand, it is boundless, then there could be any number (including zero).

Their respective powers could be different, yet leaving it impossible (or irrelevant) to determine which one is the most powerful. That is one problem with infinite quantities.

For example, there is an infinite number of positive integers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.....). Even numbers are a subset of this set (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12...) and yet, there are the same amount of even numbers as there are of integers.

There are four general categories of beliefs that deal with god(s): polytheism (many gods, either all equal, or with some gods more powerful than others -- for example the gods of Greek mythology -- or various level of deity to explain the workings of nature)
monotheism (only one god, usually all powerful and everliving),
atheism (there is no such entity as a god), and
agnostism (we cannot prove nor disprove the existence of god).

2006-12-22 18:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by Raymond 7 · 0 1

It depends how you define God...Its a lot more...complicated, I am afraid to say. Yes, there is a universal goodness. Yes, the neural prescepts set before your psychological matrix, make you have the incentive of going with nature's flow (the preservation of the biological system).And the need of spirituality that follows therein. Its all about systems. And God, well, God is information and knowledge the encompasses the essence of those systems. God is perfection, systems strive to reach the perfection. This is why jesus, is the son of God...as weird as such a concept may seem...because since God is what you could call in human vocabulary as infinite wisdom,..

(definition of understanding: you associate a concept to every other concept, so to fundamentally understand something changes the essence of your identity..because your identity is a complilation of associations, so if your old concepts are associated all with this new concept, your identity changes)

then, since jesus understood the 'infinite wisdom' concept of God, so well, he became God, because to understand anything fundamentally, means you become what you understand (this is for anything that you undersand funamentally)...the same with God.If you understand the wisdom so well in human form, you are God, but you are not God in the sense that you are human. . So jesus is God, but at the same time, not. That explains the duality. You can explain the duality if you take into account information, and the properties of entanglement. If you come d own to it, what you are, is information, your own universe of interpretation, called associations..These compilations and your pre-programmed prescepts of instinct, embedded into your identity through millions of years of wisdom (evolution), brings to you, your current state of affairs...and,

etc, etc.etc.

2006-12-22 19:05:04 · answer #4 · answered by s h 1 · 0 0

I remember back in the 80's when medical science claimed that it was not possible to contract AIDS through heterosexual sex. I remember at the time thinking, "Gee, that's a pretty odd claim to make, what do they know about AIDS to provoke that claim?"

So I investigated it a bit and found out that the claim was simply based on the then-fact that no cases had been reported that had been contracted heterosexually. To me that seemed ridiculous, but who was I to argue with established medical science. It wasn't more than a year later that the first heterosexual transmission in the US occurred.

People who claim that there is no God follow the same mentality. They won't belive in Him until they see him face-to-face. Some will believe in him sooner, perhaps when something in their life occurs that makes them require Him to survive. Others, myself amoung them, see no scientific reason why He doesn't exist; in fact, I consider the Big Bang, the one and only true creation to have occured in the history of our unverse, evidence that He does exist. Doesn't creation imply a creator?

So of course, re your second question, since the last creation appears to have occurred 14 billion years ago and included the entirety of this universe, then the same creator for all, whether recognized as such or not.

Also, I think it a bit vain and presumptuoius to unquestionably claim that we are the pinnacle of mental achievement in this universe over the last 14 billion years, let alone in the possible histories of all universes. To me, that is what someone who claims that God definitely does not exist is saying.

I can't say I know WHY He created this universe. But common sense suggests to me that it was some form of procreation. To me, this idea not only might be reasonable, but is somewhat in agreement with the bible ("fellowship"), provided you allow for some reasonable interpretation.

Was humanity one of His goals? I think so, since we are capable of asking questions about him, and both religiously and scientifically we seem to be seeking Him or at least, moving closer to Him. But the question burning in my mind is whether current humanity is His goal, or is it actually a humanity of the future that technologically finds a way to meet Him face to face? I'm really hoping it's the former, and need faith to believe it, tho the scientific part of me leans toward the latter.

Best wishes in your search.

2006-12-22 19:25:44 · answer #5 · answered by Gary H 6 · 0 0

So many different religions believe in 'the only god'. So, which is right? I don't believe in god but it is your choice to choose what you think is right.

2006-12-22 18:29:09 · answer #6 · answered by HolyFuck 2 · 0 0

yes i believe there is a god,and i believe there is only one god that rules all.coz if there r more than one god,try to imagine what would hapen if they fight between each other,apocolypse for sure,complete cuios and disaster will happen in the universe.so there is only one god.and i belive in him.it is just common sense.

2006-12-22 20:15:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, there is a God. He is the only one. He reigns over everything, even places that we can't even imagine.

2006-12-22 18:35:44 · answer #8 · answered by jovijunkee 1 · 0 0

I think their is a god and only one god. But you could have many doubt's immidietly if you dont believe in him.

2006-12-22 20:57:17 · answer #9 · answered by Pancha 2 · 0 0

Yes,the God brothers and sisters dived up the universe so they each have some.They share, they are not greedy,as we are.We have God Jehovah.You'll have to ask the entity who its brothers and sisters are.Being another peon, I'm not privy to this information.

2006-12-22 22:20:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers