Apart from the obvious (ie their hatred of anything non-white), what does this party have to say about education, health, transport, nuclear defense, the environment, foreign policy.
Also, how do they propose to solve the UK's time bomb - ie a diminishing young (working) population and a growing older (non-working) population?
2006-12-22 08:15:48 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Gazza - you are misinformed. If you are "half a foreigner" once the BNP get in it won't be long before you will be treated like a second class citizen - if not thrown out.
There cannot be more than 1% of the population who could be classed as "immigrants" how can this 1% be the root of all the UK's problems?
The BNP stand for everything non-white and non-British. You, my dear, fall within the latter.
2006-12-22 09:03:38 · update #1
could you bend right over,
you`d make an old man very happy !
2006-12-22 10:45:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
errrrrrrr. your an idiot. plain and simple. Theres nothing worse than someone complaining about the BNP. Yeh they have a bad reputation due to the other parties and somethings that happened in the past but so does everything on earth if you look at it that way.
THINGS CHANGE GET OVER IT.
The UKs time bomb. Whats this??? theres not enough people of a young age to do the jobs at the lower end of the scale??? You are wrong. How can this be correct? Can they see into the future? Whats not to say next year a load of kids are not born. Dont we have the highest teen pregnancy in europe? Wont there kids become adults who may want to work?
You are just like the labour party, the torys and the Lib Dems - cowards whos only offensive against the BNP is to bad mouth it.
2006-12-23 10:34:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
To be honest political policies are rarely important in elections as far as I can see. It would appear that the record of the party in power is more important in losing an election than winning.
In Scotland where the SNP operate, there would appear to be a two horse race in operation. With the Labour party in decline and the rest being the gainers.
What the SNP have to say appears to be irrelevant, compared to the separationist policy. This is quite significant, especially when one would consider the valuation and splitting of pensions on divorce from the UK. It could be a rather expensive divorce if the pensions and other benefits are valued properly.
I don't think it is necessarily a race issue, more of a control issue. Certainly when BT was divorced from the government (or sold off to shareholders), the enormous £5bn pension deficit had to be guaranteed due to the promise on divorce.
2006-12-22 08:37:52 · answer #3 · answered by James 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets dispell one myth! Okay the BNP are not really currently an amicable party! But in a lot of instances they are right... don't you deny what you have often thought yourself!
There are a lot of what if's that are taboo in this country! (UK)
i may or nor believe in what they have to say!
But lets not forget every mans freedom of speech...
The BNP are not against everything non white! get it out of your head now! They have a Sikh official and some asian support!
They do not state lets get every blue, green, red, purple, person out of the uk!
What they do want is for the UK Citizen to come first! That is UK Citizen!!!!!
Ask yourself a question... why do we not have apprentice schemes, yts etc!
Why is the NHS on overload?
Where do a lot of taxes go?
Why are UK collage graduates not given free education!
because the government do not even know how many illegal immigrants are in the UK!
I agree they have had there moments the BNP! But what I think is generally in the UK peoples goats are up, because the situation seems to be a free for all!
And a lot of it is cash in hand!
Lets just say! For the record! I'm not a supporter! I'm not racist, my family came here during the War... Learned the language, got work, paid there taxes, gave too the economy... Yet as a half foreigner, I agree wholeheartedly with a lot they say!
If you where to go to Pakistan for instance, you would have to conform to certain standards! Albeit sometimes in a less than democratic way, them Laws have to be abided by! Same goes for many countries... Why is England such a push over?
Maybe ask Mr Blair, The Tories and every other party before them or next to them!
Peace too the World!
2006-12-22 08:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by AZRAEL è 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Elfreda, I am not necessarily advocating the BNP stance or political agenda, but if I may be so bold as to inquire. You speak of a multi-cultural society and presumably the BNP's aversion to it. Your question to me is presumptuous in that you assume Great Britain SHOULD be a multu-cultural society?
Perhaps the question should be - list the benefits of a multicultural society? Whilst I have no problem with Asians or Blacks or Balkan communities for that matter (and some of my best friends are from these backgrounds) I cannot see any advantage to a multicultural society, especially one where the vast majority of the ethnics in this country have made their money after arriving on British shores. Initially from funds that they have, in no way, shape or form, contributed to.
Sure they help business in the short term by working for less than their British counterparts, but that is a short lived fix. From the point of view of the ethnic learning what the going rate for the work they are doing should be and then campaigning to have their pay brought into line with ours as well as not being able to do some jobs as well as their British counterparts because of their foreign mentality.
The commercial driving industry is a classic example of this. I have a friend who is a transport manager for a well known supermarket chain. His bosses arguement is that they have had to employ a number of Balkan ethnics to make up the short fall in British drivers to staff their 24/7 fleet especially over the Christmas period and to take into account of the new driver hours regulations from the EEC that state that a driver can now only work 48 hours in any given week. Which is why many of the suoermarket delivery transport companies now work a 48 hour permanent rolling shift.
They are saving money in that the Balkan drivers are working for £2.50 less an hour than their British counterparts would, but the damage being done to the HGV fleet is immense, because they cannot seem to drive safely on British roads. This is borne out by my own experience.
I work for an Industrial Drainage company and one of their biggest clients is the same company that my friend is transport manager for. I hear complaints every time I visit a store where the foreign drivers have backed onto the loading bay's unsafely or done damage to the trailer and/or the loading area, because of their lack of skill and inability to communicate properly.
Don't tell me that that is the company's fault for not giving out enough training! It is the company's fault but because of their greed in not wanting to pay British drivers the money they deserve.
There is a national shortage of commercial HGV drivers in this country at the moment and so British driving rates of pay are at a premium. The government's and transport companies solution to this has been to outsource rather than train and pay British drivers the reflective going rate. I didn't notice the companies complaining about it in the early 80s when HGV drivers were ten a penny and the situation was reversed.
Each country is deeply ensconsed in its own way of life and we can no more interact sucessfully in other countries than these ethnic minorities can successfully intergrate themselves in ours? In my opinion multi-cultural societies just don't work!
We should be getting the governments of the world that weild the real power (America, us, China, Germany, France) to right the wrongs in the countries where economic migrancy is all but forced on its citizens.
By all means holiday in foreign countries, research foreign countries, learn new customs, languages, geographies and histories, but don't interact with on a permanent basis, it just causes more problems than it solves.
2006-12-24 21:56:27 · answer #5 · answered by statusquo44 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the rascist rhetoric remains rampant in the ranks.
and theres no need for it. to be British is to lay down your life for the flag, for your sovereign, for our collective freedom. . we all bleed red blood... what does it matter the colour of a mans skin. many fearsome warrior races such as the maori, teh gurkha's, teh seikh's, all fought and died under a British flag on a foreign field.
their politics are debatable, but in principle better than anything and of the other contenders have to offer. government isnt about opression and subjugation, division and sedition... divided we shall alway be weak, as one voice we can shatter the silence.
our workforce isnt dimishing, teh opportunity to work, thats whats diminishing... our oldies, and schoolkids, well theyd be a lot better off if valuable rescources werent being wasted and given away to NON taxpaying "economic migrants and political refugees" yes, we offer tehm humanitarian aid, were not monsters, its a founding principle of this country, we help thiose less able... we gave more than any other country to last years tsunami appeal, we are charitable by nature.. but some folks are taking the mickey... and something needs to be done. or by the time were in need of the NHS, itll be a footnote in the history books.
my dad always said, charity starts at home.. look after your own first. someone ought to tell that to whitehall.
2006-12-22 10:12:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Apart from racial hatred these "people" have nothing to say at all. They are social inadequates who lean on anything that they can to push their views. Having said that, we do live in a democracy and despite my disgust with their views I have to concede to and even agree with their right to air those views, no matter how abhorrent they appear to me.
2006-12-22 20:58:33 · answer #7 · answered by Hoss 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
HEY HONEY I HOPE YOUR WRITING FOR THE ONE'S THAT CAN READ KNOW WHY THIS IS NOT THE LAND OF THE FREEDOM OF SPEACH.I HOPE THE BRAIN DEAD HERE UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR SAYING.I TOTALY AGREE WITH YOU.
YOU HAVE THE BALLS TO AT LEAST SPEAK UP AND BE COUNTEDE.GOOD ONE LOVE HOPE SOME MORE FELLAS HERE TAKE THERE MAKE UP OFF AND WEAR THERE PANT'S BACK ON BEFORE WE WOMEN DECIDE TO DO THERE JOB'S.
2006-12-24 09:58:29 · answer #8 · answered by mariolla oneill 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most of the people in uk are immigrants or the children of immigrants or grandchildren so what is the problem with people, once they are here they forget were their descendants came from, the people to fear are the ones that use the name of god to excuse them of their actions
2006-12-24 02:36:52 · answer #9 · answered by alenn g 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Have a look on their website. You can avoid the pages about race & immigration (I think we all know where they stand on that !), and just look at the ones that deal with your questions.
2006-12-22 08:24:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are just as valid as any of the so called respecable political parties. They are all in it for their own benefit. Abandon the lot of them & consider anarchy, it may not be as bad as you fear!
2006-12-22 22:15:46 · answer #11 · answered by DAVE 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋