http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/21/143259
2006-12-22 06:55:59 · 16 answers · asked by Ringo G. 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeah right....he's done sooo well in Iraq we just cant wait for him start another money sucking clusterf'ck....lol
2006-12-22 07:05:42 · answer #1 · answered by rubiconski 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets hope not the military is already stretched to the breaking point, their claim, Russia just sold sams to Iran, China just made a deal for oil exploration as did Russia with them, so we might be bitting off more than Bush can chew if he tries, its most likly a show of force, again there were no Iranians involved in 911! He ought to rethink about his allies the Saudi's you know the royal house of Saud the guys who brought you Bin Ladden and other infamous highjackers
2006-12-22 15:32:07 · answer #2 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have bitten off enough with Iraq and Afganistan already. I think Bush can expect know support for an attack on Iran unless Iran provokes the situation. Sadly the idiots in Tehran make Bush look like an Einstein. I don't think we would want or desire a war with Iran - but Iran is very dangerous and stupid which is a very bad combination.
Good Luck!!!
2006-12-22 15:02:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Doubt it. It's obvious Iran is a LOT more powerful than Iraq was. Their army has 500 thousand soldiers. They have a paramilitary called the basijj, who may have up to 11 MILLION members. That's 1 in 7 people in Iran trained to use weapons. Iran is nearly 3 times the size of Iraq. Iran has a much more advanced army - and all their equipment is manufactured in the country, because they're isolated - just like Nazi Germany had. Iran also is a cohesive entity, it's existed for thousands of years longer than Iraq has. The people don't hate each other, so the country wouldn't fall apart - and there would be a significantly stronger resistance.
If Bush wanted a war like in Iraq he would HAVE to bring in the draft - and stop the Russians and Chinese from getting annoyed and embargo'ing the US, especially for oil. Try getting that through congress. Radical Islam, nuclear weapons - I think people may even prefer that to the deaths of COUNTLESS normal US citizens, brothers, fathers - maybe even sisters and mothers.
2006-12-22 15:01:10 · answer #4 · answered by Mordent 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Even if he wanted to do that (I have no idea if he does), he would have a hard time, seeing as our Army is already WAY overstretched throughout the world. Bush just asked for more troops to go to Iraq, and the draft has come up a a way to get those troops.
2006-12-22 15:05:05 · answer #5 · answered by greencoke 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the liberals sure have you hoodwinked. You are not even close to the facts. I bet you get laughed at a lot.
2006-12-22 15:02:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think George Bush has any plans to attack Iran. Iran is likely to take care of itself since the people there are more independent than most middle east countries. In fact, they are already doing it at their elections.
2006-12-22 15:00:35 · answer #7 · answered by richarddelightful 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hoodwink? you are a moron. Iran is the hub for radical Islam all over the globe.
The war against radical Islam ends with the fall of Tehran.
2006-12-22 14:58:44 · answer #8 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
We dont decide who our government goes to war with, that woudl be our congress.
2006-12-22 15:06:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope not. Surely by now everyone can see him for what he is. A money grubbing idiot. Then again some folks never learn.
2006-12-22 15:00:06 · answer #10 · answered by firefly 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋