English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

i ditched all my friends for 20 years and the bastard found him self a young skank, so from that day on i realized that friends are so much more important cuz they were still there for me when I needed them.

2006-12-22 06:57:41 · answer #1 · answered by Joni J 6 · 2 0

I would have a bunch of true and good friends but no lover. Because friends are great treasures to be cherished, and they are always your rock and constant in life. Lovers can always leave but real friends don't. Until you find a person who can be your friend and your lover.

2006-12-22 15:55:03 · answer #2 · answered by ♥♥Bree♥♥ 7 · 0 0

Rather be in Love

2006-12-22 14:56:53 · answer #3 · answered by wHaT eVeR 7 · 1 0

A bunch of friends, because you can get a lover from them. With no friend, if the lover left, you'd be with no one but minimal family.

Season's greetings!

Ritz

2006-12-22 14:57:38 · answer #4 · answered by Ritz (loves The Hush Sound) 5 · 0 1

be in love with no friends, because my lover is my best friend

2006-12-22 15:00:40 · answer #5 · answered by KylieM 6 · 0 0

I would rather have friends.

2006-12-22 14:57:34 · answer #6 · answered by rogue_roque 4 · 0 1

a bunch of friends, but no lover.
nothing is greater than friendship.

2006-12-22 14:57:56 · answer #7 · answered by IDNTGIVASHT 6 · 0 1

love

2006-12-22 14:56:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

i need my friends but deep down inside, i would never be happy

2006-12-22 14:56:06 · answer #9 · answered by i am the dream u r the dreamer 5 · 3 1

Neither. I deserve both. To have my cake and eat it, too. :)

2006-12-22 14:57:33 · answer #10 · answered by daughtofthking 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers