The president and his cabnet have used the publics resourses to further private intrests, to polorize the public, and create an unwinable war that stimulates military production and government contracts to insider groups. None of it sounds like it is in the publics intrest. I feel betrayed and think he should be investagated.
I also think that the CIA is responsable for undermining public authority over it's government. The idea of such a government entity that can not be audited by the public, is counterproductive to the American publics control over their own affairs.
2006-12-22 06:30:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Your argument would be a lot more effective if you didn't misspell every third word.
I agree with your basic point, but look at it from Bush's point of view - he honestly believes that his "private agenda" serves the public good and the public interest, and in his version of the world, it does. The rest of us, however, have different values and therefore a different view of the situation.
2006-12-22 06:36:56 · answer #1 · answered by teresathegreat 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
sooner or later, the Republicans will ask the real question? "Why did we no longer win?" You had the superb possibility of the century. there have been such fairly some on the fence this time waiting to be persuaded. So, what substitute into the real reason Republicans lost? it isn't the only they made up. I paid taxes decrease than each and every President. i'm no longer undesirable. i'm no longer wealthy. I paid for each little thing I even have. Now, why did no longer I vote for Republican? I wasn't that happy with Pres Obama. i'm purely as happy as i substitute into once I voted for him.
2016-10-18 21:11:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't need professional help, so ignore "only p". What more proof does he need? Not long ago Bush couldn't even give us a straight answer on whether or not we could ever win this war! He even had a plan of sending more of our sons, fathers, cousins, etc. overseas to die. He wants to eliminate social security, believes that Americans are "lazy" and supports outsourcing, HELL even his mother thought that Katrina victims were getting 5-star treatment at the Embassy Suites! If that isn't proof of selfishness, personal gain, private agenda, and human sacrifice, then whomever voted for Bush are some lost, blindsided souls.
2006-12-22 06:59:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you way off base. The question is should the media be charged with treason for only reporting the bad news, taking things out of context, and siding with the liberals, in an attempt to
sway the voting publics opinion of the president, his policies and the war in Iraq of which you are a perfect example of.
2006-12-22 06:50:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think calling it treason is excessive. And I think the first answer is just a knee-jerk answer totally without merit.
President shouldn't manipulate opinion, but then media shouldn't knuckle under to ratings and threats that they are "oogy boogy unpatriotic" and "want us to lose the ---". And the voters should have asked more questions, not just swallowed everything these folks fed us and voted a second time for Bush just because he scared us half to death.
2006-12-22 06:37:01 · answer #5 · answered by ash 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you 100%, but watch and see if it'll ever happen. People are either apathetic or just plain living in fear.
2006-12-22 06:39:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
My sentiments exactly... But what options are there; Civil War or extra Vaseline?
2006-12-22 06:39:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its only treason if it harms the country's interest. Otherwise its just politics.
2006-12-22 06:43:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Seek professional help. You have no proof for any of these allegations.
2006-12-22 06:37:28 · answer #9 · answered by only p 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
TRY LIVING IN TEHRAN FOR AWHILE
2006-12-22 06:33:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋