English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally i would have given him it for the effort

2006-12-22 06:07:33 · 11 answers · asked by david l 2 in Sports Football English Football

11 answers

OUT.!!!

2006-12-22 06:09:09 · answer #1 · answered by JAM123 7 · 0 1

It was just on the line, so it's not classed as a goal. He was incredibly unlucky. So it was neither in or out, it was on the line. the ref was right not give it. But he deserved it to go in, it was a great try, even though i support Chelsea.

2006-12-22 06:51:03 · answer #2 · answered by CHELSEAGIRL 2 · 0 0

if the ball was going over the line for a throw in it would be out but referees make up the rules as they go along i think the whole ball wasnt over the line

2006-12-22 08:31:12 · answer #3 · answered by martinf430 3 · 0 0

it was a goal. the ball was FULLY over the line. from the replays it looks like the ball is touching the line but the bounce of the ball it had to be a goal

2006-12-22 07:39:55 · answer #4 · answered by conor210782 4 · 1 0

no becuase the ball didnt totally cross the line and even if it was given as a goal chelsea would have gone on and won anyway being the cheats that they are.....

2006-12-22 06:09:22 · answer #5 · answered by ZappBranagan 3 · 0 1

out because it was against Chelsea, but it would have been in if he had been playing for Chelsea!

2006-12-22 06:18:48 · answer #6 · answered by martin C 2 · 0 0

Very difficult one. The picture they showed from behind the goal it looked in....?

2006-12-22 07:16:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

obviously out

2006-12-22 08:32:25 · answer #8 · answered by tottenham 2 · 0 0

the ball was in everyone can see that the ball was in

2006-12-22 08:07:38 · answer #9 · answered by ianjohnpaul 3 · 0 0

it was out

2006-12-22 06:10:25 · answer #10 · answered by vkfpbwoldwf 6 · 0 0

in

2006-12-23 06:12:59 · answer #11 · answered by eyikoda 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers