2006-12-22 05:20:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
a traitor to who...to his own gang of super rich people or the rest of America....Quite ridiculous to call him a traitor for cooperating with the Congress....finally, a balanced government! If he has been a traitor, it's because of his lack of concern for the oath he took to protect and defend the US Constitution
Corporations have no interest in providing good wages, because they hire illegals...the money is sent to Mexico and leaves this economy...RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE, FINE COMPANIES FOR HIRING ILLEGALS, AND MAKE THIS A BETTER ECONOMY FOR AMERICANS...ALL AMERICANS, NOT JUST THE RICHEST
2006-12-22 05:26:33 · answer #1 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, but is it even relevant in places like California, where the minimum wage is higher and you get people working in fast food places making above minimum just so they have enough people working there?
2006-12-22 13:40:07 · answer #2 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not good for the working class. The cost of goods and services that min wage workers supply will increase. The working class (middle and lower) are the ones who have a difficult time paying for these goods and services.
The rich don't care if the price of cheeseburger doubles, they can afford it.
He is a traitor to conservatism for this issue.
2006-12-22 13:27:32 · answer #3 · answered by Ransom 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush still doesn't believe in raising the wage, he is just trying to appear softer. Too late
2006-12-22 14:44:24 · answer #4 · answered by firewomen 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. A minimum wage increase would destroy the economy because everyone would raise their prices on goods. This will help to make the soon-to-be democrat controlled congress look even worse. They were going to destroy the economy regardless.
2006-12-22 13:26:23 · answer #5 · answered by Abu 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Good grief - you Dems are never happy, are you? You wanted the increase, you got it - and you're STILL complaining.
Merry Christmas.
2006-12-22 13:33:57 · answer #6 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's called pandering to the left....not treason. The right will get something in return. His conundrum is that he must pander now since the elections. playing I'll scratch yours if you'll scratch mine.
2006-12-22 13:24:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who know but I would love to see him and family live on minimum wages...LMAO
2006-12-22 13:23:59 · answer #8 · answered by SUN FLOWER 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Care for some cheese with that whine?
2006-12-22 13:48:43 · answer #9 · answered by Dr. Quest 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If that is true, it shows his dedication to bipartisanship.. If he approves it because he attached a huge tax break for businesses to it, then all bets are off
2006-12-22 13:24:47 · answer #10 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋