English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A.ASA

B.SSS

C.SSA

D.SAS

2006-12-22 05:13:49 · 9 answers · asked by Gloria 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

9 answers

C

2006-12-25 16:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by _anonymous_ 4 · 0 0

SSA is not valid. This is fairly easy to see through trial constructions. Note: For right triangles this is also a valid theorem for congruence, but not in the general case.

2016-05-23 16:02:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

SSA is not valid. Unless the triangle is a right triangle, there are two different ways to construct it with SSA.

One way to remember it is invalid is to spell it backwards. Bad word. Bad proof.

2006-12-22 05:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Northstar 7 · 1 0

C.SSA in some cases, there will be 2 possible triangles given SSA.

2006-12-22 07:10:56 · answer #4 · answered by mu_do_in 3 · 0 0

Side Side Angle is not a proof of congruence.

2006-12-22 05:24:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

C Side Side Angle is not valid (neither is AAA)

2006-12-22 09:00:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ssa

2006-12-22 05:39:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

C

2006-12-22 05:27:53 · answer #8 · answered by Maths Rocks 4 · 0 0

C.SSA

2006-12-22 05:23:40 · answer #9 · answered by chris102188 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers