C
2006-12-25 16:39:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by _anonymous_ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
SSA is not valid. This is fairly easy to see through trial constructions. Note: For right triangles this is also a valid theorem for congruence, but not in the general case.
2016-05-23 16:02:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
SSA is not valid. Unless the triangle is a right triangle, there are two different ways to construct it with SSA.
One way to remember it is invalid is to spell it backwards. Bad word. Bad proof.
2006-12-22 05:29:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Northstar 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
C.SSA in some cases, there will be 2 possible triangles given SSA.
2006-12-22 07:10:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by mu_do_in 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Side Side Angle is not a proof of congruence.
2006-12-22 05:24:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
C Side Side Angle is not valid (neither is AAA)
2006-12-22 09:00:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ssa
2006-12-22 05:39:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
C
2006-12-22 05:27:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Maths Rocks 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
C.SSA
2006-12-22 05:23:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by chris102188 2
·
1⤊
0⤋