I would have to know more about her, what are her points? what does she hope to accomplish? what is in it for me? No one knows where she stands on anything. Let us wait to see.
2006-12-22 05:16:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God no. She would have this country turned upside down and communistic. Had enough Clinton when her husband was in. Besides look more into what she has done an said herself and where she stands on a lot of issues and anyone with a sane rational mind will see she is a horrible choice for Presidency.
2006-12-22 05:19:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fallen 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
Whenever she says something you never get an answer, just a bunch of big jumbled words. She won't state a clear position, on Iraq or anything else, which is understandable. Since her husband stated during his presidency that Iraq needed to comply or face military action, if she said she was against Iraq war republicans would eat her for lunch by quoting her husband. If she said she was for Iraq her liberal base would abandon her.
Instead, she is for nothing.
2006-12-22 05:21:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by CP 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. No. Oh wait...no.
Not a chance. I would consider ANY other Dem, but not her. We didn't learn the second Bush? Do we really want a second Clinton? Especially THAT one.
Obama I might vote for.
2006-12-22 05:10:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve H 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, national security would go down the drain with her at the head. She is not as strong a candidate as Barak Obama or other democrats who are new and fresh. Still that said Juliani is going to be the next president
2006-12-22 05:10:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by jdog33 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nope
2006-12-22 05:10:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sway 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nine negative answers so far and I'm the tenth!
She is a total nutcase. Imagine the world left in her hands! o.0
2006-12-22 05:11:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♫ ∫aoli 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Definitely yes, even though she voted for the war.
We were all given false information (lied to).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKh9mRQbNLg&NR
[Click on "watch again" to view Bush lying about...]
2006-12-22 05:16:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
HILLARY WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT.
It's already been decided by the News Media and the Rich & Powerful here, and around the world.
She supports Bush in Iraq. And that will also help her.
She's betting on Bush.
The fact that she was born with too many chromosomes for a woman, won't hurt her.
2006-12-22 05:12:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
I'd vote for her as many times as I could
2006-12-22 05:45:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋