English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

No, I think there was no need to because of series' of events having been aligned over a period of time, along with our lackadaisical national security practices at the time. I think the leadership in our government is self interested- okay downright greedy- can you say Haliburton? But I don't believe that the Bush Administration did or would conspire to kill American civilians.

2006-12-22 04:47:25 · answer #1 · answered by catarina 4 · 0 0

Man, where do you people come out of the woodwork at? I gotta get some "spray" to stop up the cracks you guys slither out of...sheesh!

Conspiracy theories are like a dead horse... They take up space... After a time, they plain ol stink to high heaven... And when a good wind blows, many people are so naseated by the smell of it... Plus at the end, its all fertilizer (being polite here).

I wish you well..

Jesse

2006-12-22 04:41:24 · answer #2 · answered by x 7 · 0 0

Give me a break and give your brain a rest. You spend too much time looking for ulterior motives that aren't there. Do you still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny too?

2006-12-22 04:38:47 · answer #3 · answered by weareonvacation 2 · 1 0

Sandy Berger thinks Clinton did it.
He stole and destroyed classified documents to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
Do you think both Bill & Hillary were responsibile?

2006-12-22 04:34:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The ignorance and audacity of this question doesn't warrant a real answer. Your inquiry obviously shows you lack the necessary intellect to grasp a real answer.

2006-12-22 04:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by angelthe5th 4 · 0 1

I keep asking the question...What would Bush gain by going to war in Iraq if he didn't believe there were WMD's? He had to believe there were some, we all know they had some..they used them..If he didn't really believe this didn't he know he would be found out to have lied. This could do him no good. It would only create problems for him, ruin his record in history, and hurt the USA......so what would be the advantage in going to war?

2006-12-22 04:33:10 · answer #6 · answered by USAjane 2 · 3 2

Great, another one!

You and Truther must be sitting at the same Starbucks right now.

In a word, NO!

2006-12-22 04:30:55 · answer #7 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1 1

GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD!!!!!!!! 9/11 HAD NOTHING TO DOOOO WITH IRAQ!!!!!!!! get a life, seriously

2006-12-22 04:39:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No and there is no proof to such a statement.

2006-12-22 06:05:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont think they are that well organized

but it wouldnt surprize me if they knew about it before hand and didnt bother trying to stop it.

2006-12-22 04:30:11 · answer #10 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers