I responded to a "the sky is falling" question by pointing out that Al Sadr is showing signs of returning to the political process. I was imediately blasted with a comment from a liberal that he is just preparing his army for a final offensive of some kind.
What is it about some people that immediately look for the worst case senerio? Yes Al Sadr ending his violence won't completely end this debacle, but it will sure help. It might mean fewer Americans will lose their lives in this war.
Why are some people looking for the bad in the good instead of the other way around?
2006-12-22 03:40:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Did I say I trust this guy? I said I like seeing Iraqis return to the political process...
You know.. talk... not kill each other.
2006-12-22 03:45:17 · update #1
Al Sadr has suck neocons in like this before, he knows how to play "the game".
Sadr will only do things that will benefit his cause- returning to the political process, outnumbered 6:1 is not in his favor!
2006-12-22 03:47:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well not to defend a Liberal, but I don't trust any of the Arabs in control. Look at Yasser Arafat he been speaking out of both sides of his mouth for years. That's why I think we need to start paying attention to actions not words. If one of these guys tells us he wants peace and violence continues to happen, especially in the country were this guy is a dictator, he does not get another chance, he does not pass go, and he does not collect $200. We then do everything diplomatically in power to persuade him to follow a path that leads to peace, if he does not and the violence in his country begins to spill outside his borders then we take action.
2006-12-22 03:50:37 · answer #2 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. he's able of potential. Maliki is attempting to assuage him through fact he has grow to be very helpful. via the way, at present he's in Iran, the real participant controlling what happens in Iraq at this factor.
2016-10-15 10:49:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that with their power rising, the US should work with the Shia of Iraq and Iran to promote harmony and peace in the middle east.
2006-12-22 03:45:58 · answer #4 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Talk is cheap and the death toll or insurgent action keeps on going, so lets wait and see, I'll get excited when our men and women are home again safe and sound
2006-12-22 03:50:48 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Liberals are frightened that we Won't Lose.
They have wanted us to lose.
Why? Who knows? Warped minds?
Hatred of the USA?
Go figure.
2006-12-22 03:46:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We're not as naive as you.
What makes you think he's sincere?
P.T. Barnum was right.
Talk is cheap. Actions then Words.
2006-12-22 03:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
the dude takes orders from bush so now he is talking about talking big deal........its all a nasty little play and you are buying into it..
2006-12-22 03:50:07 · answer #8 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the lunitic left wants us to "lose" in the middle east.
They want to see this strife continue just so they can point one of their fingers and say "see, I told you so".
2006-12-22 03:44:48 · answer #9 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You'd trust a terrorist over a liberal?
2006-12-22 03:44:12 · answer #10 · answered by SatanicYoda 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋