Im just wondering cause i am and i think its good non seems dirty!!!! What do u think??
2006-12-21 23:50:28 · 9 answers · asked by Joshua 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
I don't know the actual statistics, but I am a woman, and I know that I for one, and I imagine that most women prefer their man to be circumcised. To many women, an uncircumcised male organ is gross.
2006-12-22 00:01:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
CIRCUMCISED defientely.
Most women prefer a man with a circumcised penis because it may move inside them in a less friction-based manner. Once he is inside the vagina, the circumcised penis may easily slide up and down to create pleasure for both partners.
There are several advantages for circumcised men when it comes to sexuality. First is that circumcised male have no need to worry about daily cleansing of his foreskin. Meanwhile, men with an uncircumcised foreskin must take special care to move it up and down and clean it inside its covered areas to avoid odors or serious infection because of material buildup. Consequently, there might be some bacteria and germs that could surface thus affect their sexual health.
Safe sex is an added concern for uncircumcised men and their partners. Men with foreskins occasionally have difficulty finding the right condom or keeping one on during penetrative sexual activity. That spells trouble in bed as well as generates unneeded anxiety.
As for the sensitivity of the penis, no medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm
Several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up to seven times less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://icuxbridge.icnetwork.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=14095142&method=full&siteid=53340&headline=-circumcision-protects-against-aids--name_page.html
As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html
Circumcision is an easy and nowadays painless procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.
Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.
Circumcision rates are INCREASING nowadays, both in the United States and overseas. Many African and South American countries with little circumcision tradition are starting to promote the procedure to help to reduce the AIDS-HIV infection rates.
2006-12-22 03:30:33 · answer #2 · answered by Scuba 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Almost all boys were 'cut' when I was born (1950s-60s) but waned the last 20 years as it was felt to be unnecessary. However, recent studies show uncircumsized men are more likely to carry HIV after contact than circumsized ones. I think you'll see the practice come back in force.
'Dirty' - not an issue if cleaned daily. I am circumsized, but except for personal preference, I don't think it makes any difference during sex.
Uncut guys may claim their head is more sensitive and they reach orgasm faster, but I don't think that has any merit.
2006-12-21 23:58:42 · answer #3 · answered by waynebudd 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well< I had my sons done when they were babies. But, it was something that was expected. I think it is easier to keep clean, and they will fit into the "norm" of what a woman expects. But, there is a way for them to grow the foreskin out when they are men if they decide they want to be more natural. As far as sex goes...doesn't make a difference in the performance. As far as oral sex goes... I think circumcision is the best way to go.
2006-12-22 00:11:47 · answer #4 · answered by rhonda y 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I feel something that drastic should be the decision of the boy/man. Circumcisions should only be performed for religious purposes.
2006-12-21 23:58:48 · answer #5 · answered by retrodragonfly 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
My son is. I was told by the Pediatrician that it is better for his health in the long run. He told me that it would be easier for him to clean and he would be less likely to contract infections.
2006-12-21 23:53:38 · answer #6 · answered by drgnqn576 1 · 5⤊ 1⤋
From media sources, circumcision decreases chance of spreading HIV and uterine cancer, not to mention it is more sanitary.
2006-12-21 23:59:18 · answer #7 · answered by beez 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Circumcision is unnecessary.
It actually makes sex less enjoyable, there is nothing supporting the fact that it is healthier without then with and, it's barbaric.
2006-12-21 23:54:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
It improves sex and reduces risk of infections.
2006-12-21 23:59:47 · answer #9 · answered by thewarrinoates 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋