English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

During the 1960s I was given some top sectret negative to print of the holocaust and the suffering of the jews. Those picture are imprinted on my memory. They were horrific. What kind of human being denies that this happened, and why would they try to prevent the truth.?

2006-12-21 22:28:26 · 5 answers · asked by Spiny Norman 7 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

Irving is a dangerous moron but he never denied the Holocaust as such. He said that Hitler was not aware of the Holocaust. And he denied the official number of victims pretending it is less. He is currently in jail in Austria but I think he does not deserve such a severe punishment because he can not be compared to some others Holocaust deniers who even say that there were no gas chambers and no mass murders. Irving does not deny the gas chambers and the mass murders. Surely he has sympathies for Hitler and some Nazis but he made a fool of himself during his trial against Mrs DEBORAH LIPSTADT which he superbly lost due to his arrogance and his lack of intelligence...

2006-12-22 19:05:44 · answer #1 · answered by Mimi 5 · 0 0

What kind of person would deny the holocaust - easy a convicted liar ! Or a pathetic second rate historian, who has decided controvesy is the best route to getting his name recognised.

I'm sure you will all join with me in "denying" him a Happy Christmas.

Which is fairly certain... as he'll be banged up in an Austrian prison.

Hope the warders have a right good piss in his Christmas Pot Noodle.

Ho Ho Ho !

2006-12-22 06:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by palonggai 1 · 1 0

What sort of person denies it?

An Idiot

Why would they prevent the truth?

For political reasons. Although he denies it, Irving is a right wing loon, who admires Hitler and the Nazi party

2006-12-22 08:53:12 · answer #3 · answered by Corneilius 7 · 3 0

Wasn't he basing his argument on the manner in which he believed the nazi's purely didn't have enough means of disposing of that number of bodies?

There are arguments that the ovens etc which were used wouldn't physically be able to incinerate the enormous numbers of bodies.

2006-12-22 06:49:16 · answer #4 · answered by Alan B 3 · 1 1

Not Erving, the stupid sod is called IRVING!

2006-12-22 06:37:11 · answer #5 · answered by efes_haze 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers