English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Dr. Ramados proposed an amendment where doctors after passing MBBS sholud serve in villages before they get their degrees or appear in post graduate exams.

2006-12-21 22:06:09 · 14 answers · asked by saurav s 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

14 answers

I feel not only doctors even engineers IAS students should serve in villages.

I feel sorry for the country. Each one thinks of going to the US and UK to make money! We cannot force anyone and nobody wants to. But if you neglect the health of the country and want to serve the rich nations that fill your pocket, what is the country that trainned you going to achieve!

If there a lacs of people needing medical attention, doctors are going on strike, where do we turn to! Our house is not in order how can we serve another country!

Anyways docs are required to serve as RMOs assistant doctors before they are allowed to practice independently. I think taking up such service is an opportunity to get a first hand experience and should not be avoided. In a doctors field as much cases you handle are still not enough because most of the time no 2 cases are identical!

2006-12-21 23:04:49 · answer #1 · answered by indiangal 3 · 0 0

No. Doctors who oppose working in villages could cause more harm to the people there through their lack of attentiveness. The doctors who work in villages should want to.

It would be like saying all teachers should teach in remote places before becoming certified or all lawyers should practice law in Africa before taking the bar. You can't force people to work where they don't desire to work and expect them to be effective.

The government could make many advantages to making that decision like removing the dept of student loan, offering free rent in a remote location and most of all HIGHER SALARY and benefits. People who work in remote and rather undesirable areas could be granted some kind of reward and base it on their success rate and NOT just for being there. Even a corpse can "be" somewhere but it doesn't guarantee any favorable action.

As capitalism has discovered, money can make people do amazinig things...nothing talks quite like money.

2006-12-21 22:15:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your suggestion would be like squeezing blood out of a turnip. Let the ones who have a heart and the ability to go, go. Consider the new doctor. The new doctor has been in school for upteen years, head over heels in debt. By now there is a family to support. To lay another requirement on this one seems too much.

2006-12-21 22:24:13 · answer #3 · answered by lindakflowers 6 · 0 0

Sorry Sir... i don't be attentive to plenty approximately Indian regulation yet right here i'm quoting part of record revealed in circumstances of India (Delhi/Chandigarh version dt. 12/6/10) "Sri Lankan cupboard minister for classic industries and small companies Douglas Devananda can't declare amnesty decrease than Indo-Sri Lankan Peace Accord of 1987, sense criminal experts. . . . . . . . . as quickly as criminal complaints are initiated with the submitting of a generic information record and chargesheet is filed as consistent with section 173(a million) of Code of criminal technique, then no bilateral or multilateral agreements between countries would desire to waive the criminal criminal accountability of the guy stated as an accused, mentioned V Kannadasan, specific public prosecutor for human rights courts."

2016-12-11 14:12:00 · answer #4 · answered by chaplean 4 · 0 0

yes there should really be a law 2 send the doctors immediately after gtaduation.
the docs plan 2 settle in cities and enjoy the limelite and they get a lot of money in cities.
if this rule is made they will serve the pooooor people

2006-12-21 23:55:30 · answer #5 · answered by splendid_suryansh 2 · 0 1

Yes, we have such system in place here in Finland, but it is not a solution, and neither are paying doctors more to stay in faraway places. It gives only a short term of relief. Most doctors prefer to work in metropolitan areas, I think.

2006-12-21 22:32:25 · answer #6 · answered by dane 4 · 1 0

well, maybe not a law, but some type of incentive would be effective i think. if some of the student loans were to be reduced by serving at a given location, i think that would generate some interest.

2006-12-23 17:17:50 · answer #7 · answered by cee jay 3 · 0 0

Yes.

2006-12-22 07:15:00 · answer #8 · answered by Kiran 3 · 0 0

In a communist country like India I'm sure that could happen.
Here in the real world? NO.

2006-12-21 22:13:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

see----- if sumthing is forced, the mind doesn't
tolerate it!!!!!!!!!

today majority of them take this profession to make money rather than a service

neway lets see many doctors agree with this!!!!!!!

2006-12-22 19:25:38 · answer #10 · answered by rash 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers