only 30 balls bowled and it counts as a match, surely it has to be at least 8 if not 10 overs, that is bullsh*it. Sri Lanka just won after facing only 35 balls, still got 3/4 of their innings left, ANYTHING could have happened.
2006-12-21 21:33:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
20/20 games is stupid.. it will change the cricket concept
2006-12-22 03:34:55 · answer #1 · answered by Arun J 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont remember quite the way it works but even in odi for the d/l method to apply, u need to have played 25 overs or game is called off. 20/20 is great for spectators and a bit of fun, it aint real cricket though.
2006-12-21 21:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by raja 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Cricket is game of uncertenities and we can't say anything till the last ball is bowled.
2006-12-22 00:15:38 · answer #3 · answered by Prateek G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cricket is dumb. Anyone with any skill would play baseball, not cricket, that's where the money is at. I have never played cricket before and would probably be an all-star cricket player cause no one with any talent plays cricket. It's a joke.
2006-12-21 21:48:01 · answer #4 · answered by GAud_13 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I defenitely agree with you. The calculation for minimum overs to be bowled should be in proportionate with the rule applicable for ODI or slightly more than that and not defenitely not less than that in order to be fair to the team batted first
2006-12-22 16:10:43 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
200 20 has strange rules
2006-12-22 16:28:07 · answer #6 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are right.
2006-12-22 02:51:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋